The rice class I chitinase OsChia1b, also referred to as RCC2 or Cht‐2, is composed of an N‐terminal chitin‐binding domain (ChBD) and a C‐terminal catalytic domain (CatD), which are connected by a proline‐ and threonine‐rich linker peptide. Because of the ability to inhibit fungal growth, the OsChia1b gene has been used to produce transgenic plants with enhanced disease resistance. As an initial step toward elucidating the mechanism of hydrolytic action and antifungal activity, the full‐length structure of OsChia1b was analyzed by X‐ray crystallography and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). We determined the crystal structure of full‐length OsChia1b at 2.00‐Å resolution, but there are two possibilities for a biological molecule with and without interdomain contacts. The SAXS data showed an extended structure of OsChia1b in solution compared to that in the crystal form. This extension could be caused by the conformational flexibility of the linker. A docking simulation of ChBD with tri‐N‐acetylchitotriose exhibited a similar binding mode to the one observed in the crystal structure of a two‐domain plant lectin complexed with a chitooligosaccharide. A hypothetical model based on the binding mode suggested that ChBD is unsuitable for binding to crystalline α‐chitin, which is a major component of fungal cell walls because of its collisions with the chitin chains on the flat surface of α‐chitin. This model also indicates the difference in the binding specificity of plant and bacterial ChBDs of GH19 chitinases, which contribute to antifungal activity. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss,Inc.

No abstract

The chitin-binding domain of Streptomyces griseus chitinase C (ChBD(ChiC)) belongs to CBM family 5. Only two exposed aromatic residues, W59 and W60, were observed in ChBD(ChiC), in contrast to three such residues on CBD(Cel5) in the same CBM family. To study importance of these residues in binding activity and other functions of ChBD(ChiC), site-directed mutagenesis was carried out. Single (W59A and W60A) and double (W59A/W60A) mutations abolished the binding activity of ChiC to colloidal chitin and decreased the hydrolytic activity toward not only colloidal chitin but also a soluble high Mr substrate, glycol chitin. Interaction of ChBD(ChiC) with oligosaccharide was eliminated by these mutations. The hydrolytic activity toward oligosaccharide was increased by deletion of ChBD but not affected by these mutations, indicating that ChBD interferes with oligosaccharide hydrolysis but not through its binding activity. The antifungal activity was drastically decreased by all mutations and significant difference was observed between single and double mutants. Taken together with the structural information, these results suggest that ChBD(ChiC) binds to chitin via a mechanism significantly different from CBD(Cel5), where two aromatic residues play major role, and contributes to various functions of ChiC. Sequence comparison indicated that ChBD(ChiC)-type CBMs are dominant in CBM family 5.

In the three-dimensional structure of a rice class I chitinase (OsChia1b) determined recently, a loop structure (loop II) is located at the end of the substrate-binding cleft, and is thus suggested to be involved in substrate binding. In order to test this assumption, deletion of the loop II region from the catalytic domain of OsChia1b and replacement of Trp159 in loop II with Ala were carried out. The loop II deletion and the W159A mutation increased hydrolytic activity not only towards (GlcNAc)6 but also towards polysaccharide substrates. Similar results were obtained for kcat/Km values determined for substrate reduced-(GlcNAc)5. The two mutations shifted the splitting positions in (GlcNAc)6 to the reducing end side, but the shift was less intensive in the Trp mutant. Theoretical analysis of the reaction time course indicated that sugar residue affinity at the +3 subsite was reduced from -2 kcal/mol to +0.5 kcal/mol by loop II deletion. Reduced affinity at the +3 subsite might enhance the release of product fragments, resulting in higher turnover and higher enzymatic activities. Thus, we concluded that loop II is involved in sugar residue binding at the +3 subsite, but that Trp159 itself appears to contribute only partly to sugar residue interaction at the subsite.