The findings in this report are organized in 3 main sections: the quality of leadership, the effects of climate and situational factors on leadership, and the quality of leader development. The findings are based on responses from over 16,800 uniformed leaders with an overall accuracy within +/-0.7%. Leadership quality continues to be a strength of the Army, and most of the Leadership Requirements Model competencies and attributes are effectively demonstrated. Leading others and getting results are two strong competencies. Attributes dealing with character, values, empathy, fitness, resilience, knowledge, sound judgment, and mental agility are strong as well. Elements recently added to emphasize discipline, trust, and stewardship are also effectively demonstrated by Army leaders. One consistent exception in strong indicators is the Develops Others competency. Many leaders are perceived as not providing useful counseling, nor encouraging individual development, and not showing genuine concern for subordinate development. Three-fourths of leaders are seen as putting the needs of the unit and mission first before their own needs. Leaders with negative leadership behaviors are more likely to be associated with low unit cohesion, unit discipline problems, low subordinate motivation, poor work quality, and lowered commitment to the Army. Ratings of the LD effectiveness of professional military education (PME) courses improved from the last two years. The report concludes with a look at trends and recommendations to improve leadership and leader development in the Army.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 25-04-2013 REPORT TYPE Technical Report DATES COVERED (From -To 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) ICF InternationalCubic Applications, Inc. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 426 Delaware, Suite C-3 Leavenworth, KS SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)Center for Army Leadership CAL Leadership Research, Assessment and Doctrine Division 290 Stimson Ave, Unit 4 SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORTFort Leavenworth, KS 66027 NUMBER(S) 2013-1 DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESA separate report from the Center for Army Leadership provides findings from this survey on Army civilian leaders.14. ABSTRACT CASAL is an annual survey sponsored by the Combined Arms Center to assess the quality of Army leadership and leader development. 2012 findings are based on responses from over 27,000 Army leaders, including 20,192 sergeants through colonels from the Active component, US Army Reserve, and Army National Guard. The 2012 study has additional coverage on mission command, unit trust, strategic leadership, and the Army Profession. Getting results, preparing one self, and stewardship are the most favorably rated doctrinal competencies. The Army Values, confidence and composure, and professional bearing are the highest rated attributes. Develops others continues to be the competency most needing improvement. Over three fourths of leaders are rated effective at exercising mission command. Trust among unit members is moderate with most concern among junior NCOs. Leaders who are effective at building trust also tend to achieve higher levels of morale, commitment, and work quality. The percentage of Army leaders demonstrating negative leadership behaviors to the degree they would be deemed toxic continues to be low. Operational experience continues to be the most favored leader development practice. Army courses are seen as effective by a majority of graduates at improving leadership, but average ratings did decrease. Assignment a...
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Jon J. Fallesen
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. ii OFFICER LEADER DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe present research investigated officer attitudes about leader development and education to confirm that re-design of the officer education system (OES) is valuable, and to provide perspective, information and concepts for re-design of OES. GEN Wallace, the commanding general of the Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), asked that a survey be conducted to find out what captains, majors and lieutenant colonels want. Research questions were answered through an online survey by 17,884 officers and warrant officers in the active and reserve components. The primary sample consisted of captains, majors and lieutenant colonels in the active component. Additional sampling was conducted of chief warrant officers, lieutenants, and colonels in the active component, and all ranks from chief warrant 2 to colonel were surveyed in the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Altogether, the number of randomly selected participants produced a margin of error of plus or minus 0.7%. The survey sampling was designed to assess attitudes primarily of captains, majors and lieutenant colonels; check for differences among career fields and branches; consider additional perspectives of lieutenants and colonels; and check for differences with the reserve components. The differences that existed were mostly predictable based on differences in current OES practices for different ranks, components, or branches (e.g., TDY courses received favorable ratings for company grade officers and reserve component officers).Findings show that Army officers recognize the value that OES has for learning (e.g., increasing knowledge) over ‗secondary' benefits of attendance (e.g., a break from the operational pace of deployments). Army officers believe that increasing understanding or knowledge, improving skills, and learning from and networking with peers are important outcomes of OES. Further, lieutenant colonels and colonels who supervise officers see the value in the knowledge and skills OES graduates attain and bring to their units or organizations. Two-thirds of all lieutenant colonels and colonels rate OES as effective at providing well-educated graduates to their unit; howe...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.