Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major causes of mortality & morbidity, and patient’s with better control of glycaemic parameters have lesser chronic complications associated with it. Though monotherapy with metformin is first choice for T2DM but is effective in less than 50% of patient and they should be managed with two drug therapy. Both Glimepiride and Sitagliptin are effective with metformin but there has been no study done in this region hence, we planned to study comparison of effects of glimepiride and sitagliptin with metformin in patient of T2DM.Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized study was done in all patient diagnosed with T2DM, not adequately managed by metformin alone. The patient was divided into two group G (Glimepiride with Metformin) and Group S (Sitagliptin with Metformin) and had a follow up at 3 and 6 months. The biochemical parameters were assessed at 12 weeks and 24 weeks.Results: The result of this study show that both glimepiride and sitagliptin with metformin significantly (p<0.05) lowered both the fasting blood sugar as well as postprandial blood glucose at 3 and 6 months. Glimepiride was more effective in lowering (p<0.05) the plasma glucose at 3 months but both the drugs had comparable result at 6 months. This study also showed that glycosylated haemoglobin was lowered in both groups at three and six months as compared to Day 0 (p<0.05), with glimepiride having better control of glycosylated haemoglobin at 3 months with both groups having comparable result at 6 months.Conclusions: To conclude, this study compared effects of sitagliptin and glimepiride on glycaemic parameters in patients of T2DM and found that both drugs had comparable results.
Background: This randomized prospective double-blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of low doses clonidine for perioperative haemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery.Methods: Patient’s with ASA grade I–II undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. All patients received either normal saline 10 ml (Group I) or 0.8 µg/kg (Group II) or 1 µg/kg (Group III) over duration of 180 seconds, 10 min prior to laryngoscopy and intubation. Anaesthesia was induced with 1% propofol (2 mg/kg) and maintained with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen and isoflurane. The parameters assessed at various time intervals were heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and sedation score.Results: Both doses of clonidine proved to be effective in perioperative haemodynamic stability. Clonidine 0.8 mcg/kg was as effectve and safer to Clonidine 1 mcg/kg for attenuatíon of the hemodynamíc responses to laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in the parameters of recovery between groups.Conclusions: Significant hemodynamic derangements can occur during laproscopic cholecystectomy at intubation, pneumoperitoneum and extubation. These were effectively attenuated by premedication with 0.8 mcg/kg and 1 mcg/kg of intravenous clonidine. Dose of 1 mcg/kg though found to be effective but produced adverse effects in form of hypotension and bradycardia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.