The safety of aspirin therapy in neuraxial anaesthesia has been historically questioned, and the current recommendations are still heterogeneous. A comprehensive review of clinical evidence and a comparative analysis of European and American guidelines were performed. Low-dose aspirin produces a selective, complete and irreversible cyclooxygenase-1 blockade, and higher doses do not increase the antiplatelet effect. Additional cyclooxygenase-2 blockade by high-dose aspirin might decrease the antithrombotic efficacy by inhibiting endothelial prostacyclin synthesis. Different doses of aspirin have been shown to be safe in a broad population subjected to neuraxial anaesthesia or analgesia. In the few case reports of spinal haematoma involving aspirin therapy, additional complicating factors were present. Considering the available evidence, the majority of national scientific societies agree that the isolated use of aspirin does not increase the risk of spinal haematoma and does not represent a contraindication to neuraxial blocks. The precautions regarding higher doses do not seem to be justified. Although aspirin alone is considered to be safe in neuraxial anaesthesia, the concurrent administration of other antithrombotic drugs significantly increases the risk of spinal haematoma and the recommended safety times for each of these other drugs must be strictly followed. An individualized assessment of the risks and benefits should be performed, before performing a neuraxial technique or catheter removal in a patient receiving aspirin.
Abnormal Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) activation has a pivotal role in pathogenesis of cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, known risk factors for poor outcomes in COVID-19. An additional tissue RAS imbalance trough interaction of 'severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2' (SARS-CoV-2) with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) seems to play a role in pathogenesis of COVID-19. This interaction has raised some questions about safety of RAS-inhibitors use in COVID-19 patients. On the other hand, potential benefits of RAS-inhibitors use have been suggested. This article presents a brief updated review of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) focusing on interaction with SARS-CoV-2 infection, potential risks or benefits of RAS-inhibitors use, and RAS-related therapeutic targets in COVID-19.
Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia y severidad de la parálisis residual en pacientes sin monitorización neuromuscular intraoperatoria. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudioprospectivo y observacional en 236 pacientes adultos ASA I-III intervenidos bajo anestesia general sin monitorización neuromuscular intraoperatoria. A su llegada a la Unidad de Cuidados Post-Anestesia (UCPA) se realizó la monitorización neuromuscular mediante aceleromiografía del músculo aductor del pulgar. La incidencia de parálisis residual con TOF ratio (TOFr) < 0,9 y TOFr < 0,7 fueron valorados. Resultados: La incidencia de parálisis residual en la UCPA con TOFr < 0,9 fue de 81,36% (IC 95%: 76,39-86,33) y con TOFr < 0,7 fue de 33,9% (IC 95%: 27,86- 39,94). La neostigmina fue utilizada para revertir el bloqueo neuromuscular solamente en el 48,3% de los casos. La incidencia de parálisis residual con TOFr < 0,7 fue significativamente mayor entre los que no recibieron antagonistas del bloqueo neuromuscular y los que sí lo recibieron (42,62% vs. 24,56%, p=0.003). Conclusiones: La incidencia y severidad de la parálisis residual posoperatoria en pacientes sin monitorización neuromuscular fue elevada en nuestra institución, probablemente favorecida por una dosificación no guiada de los relajantes musculares, la escasa utilidad de los criterios subjetivos para valorar la recuperación de la función neuromuscular y la falta de reversión rutinaria del bloqueo neuromuscular.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.