1. The Mw 7.8 earthquake that struck the north-east coast of the South Island of New Zealand in November 2016 caused extensive upheaval, of up to 6 m, over 110 km of coastline. Intertidal habitats were greatly affected with extensive dieoff of algal communities, high mortalities of benthic invertebrates, and greatly reduced ecosystem functioning, such as primary productivity. Only isolated pockets of key species remained in these areas, many of which were within protected areas around Kaikōura. The loss of key species of algae and invertebrates fragmented marine populationsand compromised connectivity and recovery processes because of the large dispersal distances needed to replenish populations. Severe sedimentation from terrestrial slips and erosion of newly exposed sedimentary rock compromised settlement and recruitment processes of marine species at many sites, even if distant propagules should arrive.3. The combination of habitat disruption, loss of species and their functioning, and impacts on commercial fisheries, especially of abalone (Haliotis iris), requires multiple perspectives on recovery dynamics. 4. This paper describes these effects and discusses implications for the recovery of coastal ecosystems that include the essential involvement of mana whenua (indigenous Māori people), fishers, and the wider community, which suffered concomitant economic, recreational, and cultural impacts. These community perspectives will underpin the protection of surviving remnants of intertidal marine populations, the potential use of restoration techniques, and ultimately a successful socioecological recovery.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Despite its frequent use in terrestrial and freshwater systems, there is a lack of published experimental research examining the effectiveness of spray-delivered chemicals for the management of non-indigenous and/or unwanted pests in marine habitats. This study tested the efficacy of spraying acetic acid, hydrated lime and sodium hypochlorite for the control of marine fouling assemblages. The chemicals are considered relatively 'eco-friendly' due to their low toxicity and reduced environmental persistence compared to synthetic biocides, and they were effective in controlling a wide range of organisms. Pilot trials highlighted acetic acid as the most effective chemical at removing fouling cover, therefore it was selected for more comprehensive full-scale trials. A single spray of 5% acetic acid with an exposure time of 1 min effectively removed up to 55% of the invertebrate species present and 65% of the cover on fouled experimental plates, while one application of 10% acetic acid over 30 min removed up to 78% of species present and 95% of cover. Single-spray treatments of 5% acetic acid reduced cover of the tunicate pest species Didemnum vexillum by up to 100% depending on the exposure duration, while repeat-spraying ensured that even short exposure times (1 min) achieved approximately 99% mortality. Both 5 and 10% acetic acid solutions appeared equally effective at removing the majority of algal species. This technique could be used for controlling the introduction of unwanted species or preventing the spread of pests, and is applicable to use on a variety of natural and artificial substrata, or for the treatment of structures that can be removed from the water.