Background There is no proven antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy for COVID-19. The disease progression associated with the pro-inflammatory host response prompted us to examine the role of early corticosteroid therapy in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods We conducted a single pre-test, single post-test quasi-experiment in a multi-center health system in Michigan from March 12 to March 27, 2020. Adult patients with confirmed moderate to severe COVID were included. A protocol was implemented on March 20, 2020 using early, short-course, methylprednisolone 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day divided in 2 intravenous doses for 3 days. Outcomes of standard of care (SOC) and early corticosteroid groups were evaluated, with a primary composite endpoint of escalation of care from ward to ICU, new requirement for mechanical ventilation, and mortality. All patients had at least 14 days of follow-up. Results We analyzed 213 eligible subjects, 81 (38%) and 132 (62%) in SOC and early corticosteroid groups, respectively.The composite endpoint occurred at a significantly lower rate in the early corticosteroid group (34.9% vs. 54.3%, p=0.005). This treatment effect was observed within each individual component of the composite endpoint. Significant reduction in median hospital length of stay was also observed in the early corticosteroid group (8 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated an independent reduction in the composite endpoint at 14-days controlling for other factors (aOR: 0.41; 95% CI [0.22 – 0.77]). Conclusion An early short course of methylprednisolone in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 reduced escalation of care and improved clinical outcomes.

Highlights Ultraviolet C at a dose of 1.5 J/cm 2 to both sides is effective on some models of N95 s. Straps may require additional disinfection to decontaminate properly. SARS-CoV-2 decontamination does not apply to all hospital respiratory pathogens. N95 model and fit-testing following irradiation need to be considered for UVC decontamination.

Rapid identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures can play a major role in reducing patient mortality rates. We evaluated the performance of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BC-GP) assay (Nanosphere Inc., Northbrook, IL) for detection of commonly isolated Gram-positive organisms as well as associated resistance markers from positive blood cultures. Positive blood cultures (VersaTREK; Trek Diagnostic Systems, Independence, OH) from 203 patients with Gram-positive organism infections were analyzed using the BC-GP assay within 12 h for the detection of 12 different organisms, including staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci, as well as for the presence of 3 resistance markers (mecA, vanA, and vanB). Results were compared to those of routine laboratory methods for identification and susceptibility testing. For identification of organisms and detection of resistance markers in 178 monomicrobial positive blood cultures, the BC-GP assay showed 94% and 97% concordance, respectively, with routine methods. After 25 polymicrobial cultures were included, the results showed 92% and 96% agreement for identification and resistance markers, respectively, for a total of 203 positive cultures. In 6/25 polymicrobial cultures, at least 1 isolate was not detected. Concordance levels for detection of major pathogens such Staphylococcus aureus (n ‫؍‬ 45) and enterococci (n ‫؍‬ 19) were 98% and 95%, respectively. Agreement levels for detection of resistance markers such as mecA and vanA/B were 92% and 100%, respectively. The BC-GP assay is capable of providing rapid identification of Gram-positive cocci as well as detection of resistance markers directly from positive blood cultures at least 24 to 48 h earlier than conventional methods.

BackgroundSystematic and behavioral interventions are needed to improve antibiotic use for common conditions like pneumonia.MethodsSingle pretest, post-test quasi-experiment in a 4-hospital health system in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan. Hospitalized patients treated with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and antipseudomonal antibiotics for respiratory infections from August 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016, and August 1, 2016, through January 31, 2017, were eligible for inclusion. Beginning in May 2016, respiratory cultures with no dominant organism growth and no Pseudomonas sp. or Staphylococcus aureus were reported by the clinical microbiology laboratory as “commensal respiratory flora only: No S. aureus/MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] or P. [Pseudomonas] aeruginosa.” Before intervention, these were reported as “commensal respiratory flora.” The primary end point was de-escalation or discontinuation of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or antipseudomonal therapy. Secondary clinical and safety outcomes included nephrotoxicity and in-hospital, all-cause mortality.ResultsTwo hundred ten patients were included in the study. De-escalation/discontinuation was more commonly performed in the intervention group (39% vs 73%, P < .001). After adjusting for APACHE II and Charlson Comorbidity Index, the intervention comment was associated with a 5.5-fold increased odds of de-escalation (adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.8–10.7). Acute kidney injury was reduced in the intervention phase (31% vs 14%, P = .003). No difference in all-cause mortality was detected between the groups (30% vs 18%, P = .052).ConclusionA simple, behavioral nudge in microbiology reporting increased de-escalation and discontinuation of unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics. This highlights the importance of clear, persuasive communication of diagnostic testing in improving antibiotic prescribing behaviors.

Maternal colonization with Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a primary risk factor for early-onset disease (EOD) GBS infection in infants and intrapartum prophylaxis reduces neonatal infection.…