No abstract

Purpose: We investigated virtual reality (VR) during a 2-week, undergraduate, radiology elective to determine if it improved learning outcomes and user satisfaction. Methods: Eighteen students enrolled between August 2021 and February 2022. Each student had a collaborative Zoom teaching session with a preceptor using a Picture Archive and Communications System (PACS)-like viewing system Online DICOM Image Navigator (ODIN), followed by a teaching session using a VR, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer (SieVRt). After each teaching session, the students independently reviewed 8 imaging cases and completed case related questions. The students completed a survey, rating their subjective experiences using ODIN and SieVRt. Results: There was no difference in total test scores between the two learning strategies. However, students did perform statistically better on two of five questions designed to test the detection/measurement capabilities of SieVRt vs ODIN. Students stated that they preferred using SieVRt over ODIN and agreed that they were able to view subtle imaging findings and abnormalities better using SieVRt. However, students found that some of the functions of SieVRt (measuring angles/lengths, and multitasking) were difficult. There were technical challenges with VR and minor undesirable physical effects (dizziness, nausea, etc.). Conclusions: Virtual reality has the potential to enhance radiology education by providing an immersive and engaging experience. Objectively, students were able to perform two tasks better with SieVRt. Subjectively, the VR platform received favourable reviews from students for a variety of features. There were reported technical and physical challenges related to using VR. Future developments in VR systems should focus on improving the user experience.

A patient with hemi-facial erythematous swelling as a result of borderline leprosy and reversal reaction is reported. This uncommon presentation of the disease poses initial diagnostic difficulties to the otolaryngologist. The otolaryngologist must be familiar with otolaryngologic manifestations of leprosy, since early diagnosis and treatment reduces the risk of transmission of the disease and may avoid permanent nerve damage.

BackgroundThe introduction of endoscopic ear surgery has implications for the training of otolaryngology residents.ObjectivesTo report on the status of endoscopic ear surgery and assess the effects of this new technology on otolaryngology training in Singapore, from the residents’ perspective.MethodsAn anonymous survey was conducted amongst all Singaporean otolaryngology residents. Residents’ exposure to, and perceptions of, endoscopic ear surgery were assessed.ResultsResidents from institutions that practise endoscopic ear surgery were more positive regarding its efficacy in various otological surgical procedures. Of residents in programmes with exposure to endoscopic ear surgery, 82.4 per cent felt that its introduction had adversely affected their training, with 88.3 per cent of residents agreeing that faculty members’ learning of endoscopic ear surgery had decreased their hands-on surgical load. Both groups expressed desire for more experience with endoscopy.ConclusionThe majority of residents view endoscopic ear surgery as an expanding field with a potentially negative impact on their training. Mitigating measures should be implemented to minimise its negative impact on residents’ training.