In this work, a procedure is proposed to estimate the critical energy release rate G c of the so-called cement line in cortical bone tissue. Due to the difficulty of direct experimental estimations, relevant elastic and toughness material properties at bone microscale have been inferred by correlating experimental tests and finite element simulations. In particular, three-point
Cortical bone can be considered as a heterogeneous composite at microscopic scale, composed of osteons that act as reinforcement fibres embedded in interstitial matrix. Cement lines constitute the interface between osteons and matrix, and they often behave as the weakest links along which microcracks tend to propagate. However, current simulations of crack growth using XFEM combined with usual orientation criteria as implemented in commercial codes do not capture this behaviour: they predict crack paths that do not follow the cement lines surrounding osteons. The reason is that the orientation criterion used in the implementation of XFEM does not take into account the heterogeneity of the material, leading to simulations that differ from experimental results. In this work, a crack orientation criterion for heterogeneous materials based on interface damage prediction in composites is proposed and a phantom node approach has been implemented to model crack propagation. The method has been validated by means of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) problems obtaining accurate results. The procedure is applied to different problems including several osteons with simplified 2 geometry and an experimental test reported in the literature leading to satisfactory predictions of crack paths.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.