Objetiva-se avaliar os registros de enfermagem acerca das reações transfusionais dos centros de terapia intensiva. Trata-se de estudo documental, transversal, com abordagem quantitativa. A pesquisa foi realizada em hospital terciário, entre o período de fevereiro de 2018 a janeiro de 2019, tendo uma amostra de 194 prontuários de pacientes que foram transfundidos em 2015. Os dados foram coletados por formulário acerca do processo transfusional e analisados por software estatístico. Foram avaliados 194 prontuários, destes 173 (89,2%) continham informações sobre identificação dos pacientes, em 124 (63,9%) de registros completos sobre início e término da transfusão e 47 (24,2%) dos registros sobre possíveis reações transfusionais, entretanto 124 (63,9) estavam incompletos acerca da ocorrência de reações transfusionais. Conclui-se que os registros de enfermagem foram classificados como falhos, tendo em vista a detecção de inconsistências no preenchimento dos prontuários, sendo necessária realização de atividades de cunho educativo para corrigir eventuais falhas e melhorar a segurança do paciente.
Objectives: to map methods and devices used to assess very short-, short-, medium-, and long-term pressure variability in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: scoping review conducted in January and February 2021 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies conducted within the last ten years analyzing pressure variability in adult and older patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 were included. Studies that used discontinued devices were excluded. Results: the sample was composed of 25 articles published since 2017, with the majority developed in Japan (n=11); with the predominance of the oscillometric method (n=22); the most used devices were from the Omron® brand (n=14); the most detected type was long-term variability (n=10). Conclusions: we observed the increasing application of the oscillometric method for pressure variability analysis with various brands and models of automatic devices.
Objective:To map the methods and number of blood pressure (BP) assessments used to assess the very short, short, medium, and long term variability of blood pressure (VBP) in adults and elderly patients with type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)Design and method:A cooping review was conducted, following the Jonna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, in January and February 2021, in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases. Studies carried out in the last 10 years, without language restrictions, that cooping VBP in adults and elderly with type 1 or 2 DM were included. After the extraction process, the articles were imported into Zotero reference manager for duplicate removal, followed by screening by two reviewers. The PRISMA extension for cooping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was used to organize and present the process of selection of articles.Results:A total of 3,795 articles were identified, of which 25 made up the final sample. Most studies were published in 2016 (60%) and used a cross-sectional (44%) approach. There was a predominance of studies with type 2 DM, and Japan had the highest number of publications (44%). There was a predominance of the oscillometric method of assessing BP (88%), and the predominant type of variability in the studies was long-term VBP (40%). There was variation in the number of measurements depending on the assessment method. In the assessment of short-term VBP, the performance of a measurement every 30 minutes during the day and every 60 minutes at night (16%) stood out; on the other hand, for medium and long-term VBP, three measurements were performed in the morning and at night (20%).Conclusions:Evidence points to the growing use of the oscillometric method. Furthermore, long-term VBP, obtained from visit to visit, was highlighted in the studies in the event of diabetes-related complications, and it was observed that there was a variation in the number of measurements adopted, which can be attributed to the lack of consensus on the recommendations for each type of BP assessment method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.