Purpose Severe myelosuppression in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing 6-MP-based maintenance therapy is attributed to TPMT gene polymorphisms, which is rare in Asian populations. This study aims to evaluate the role of selected polymorphisms in NUDT15, ITPA , and MRP4 genes in addition to TPMT in predicting 6-MP intolerance during ALL maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods We screened for the presence of NUDT15*3 (c.415 C>T, rs116855232); MRP4 c.2269 C>T (rs3765534), ITPA c.94 C>A (rs1127354) polymorphisms in addition to TPMT *2 (rs1800462), *3A (*3B and *3C; rs1800460 and rs1142345) in ALL patients with documented severe neutropenia (cohort-1; n=42). These polymorphisms were then screened in a prospective cohort of ALL patients (cohort-2; n=133) and compared with 6-MP dose reduction, early/late myelotoxicity. Results Nineteen (45%) patients in cohort-1 and 18 (14%) in cohort-2 had NUDT15 c.415 C>T variant while 4 (3%) patients in cohort-2 had TPMT*3C variant. Five (12%) in cohort-1 and 30 (24%) in cohort-2 had ITPA c.94 C>A variant while 9 (22%) and 15 (12%) had MRP4 c.2269 C>T variant in cohorts-1 and 2, respectively. All in cohort-1 and 36 (27%) in cohort-2 had severe myelotoxicity. Twenty-eight patients (66.6%) in cohort-1 and 40 (30%) patients in cohort-2 had significant 6-MP dose reduction. NUDT15 c.415 C>T variant explained severe myelotoxicity in 63% and 33% in cohort 1 and 2. TPMT *3C and ITPA c.94 C>A variants also explained myelotoxicity in cohort-2 (Median ANC: 376 vs 1014 mm 3 ; p=0.04 and 776 vs 1023 mm 3 ; p=0.04 respectively). NUDT15 c.415 C>T polymorphism explained significant myelotoxicity (507 vs 1298 mm 3 ; p<0.0001) in the multivariate analysis as well (β=−0.314, p<0.0001). Conclusion NUDT15 c.415 C>T (15*3), TPMT*3C, as well as ITPA c.94 C>A and MRP4 c.2269 C>T polymorphisms explain hematotoxicities. Preemptive genotype-based ( NUDT15*3, TPMT, ITPA c.94 C>A) 6-MP dosing could improve the outcome after maintenance therapy.

Early complications post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) can be life threatening. Although several biomarkers have been identified to correlate with these complications and their response to treatment, these are yet to be used in clinical practice. Here, we evaluated circulating endothelial cells (CECs) (n = 26) and plasma biomarkers (ST2, REG3α, VCAM1, ICAM1, TIM3) (N = 210) at early time points, to determine their association with early complications post‐HSCT. Elevated CEC counts at the end of conditioning was associated with GVHD, indicating endothelial damage during HSCT. Plasma levels of REG3α, VCAM1, ICAM1, and TIM3 on day 14 (D14) and D14 ICAM1 and D28 ST2 were significantly higher in patients with SOS and aGVHD, respectively. Upon sub‐group analysis, D28 ST2, D14/D28 REG3α, and D14 ICAM1 levels were significantly higher in patients with gastrointestinal GVHD, while D28 ST2 was higher in those with skin/liver GVHD. High ST2 levels on D28 was significantly associated with non‐relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival. Our results suggest that elevated ST2 levels on D28 could predict the likelihood of developing aGVHD and could influence NRM and OS.

Therapeutic options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have remained unchanged for nearly the past 5 decades, with cytarabine and anthracyclines and use of hypomethylating agents for less intensive therapy. Implementation of large-scale genomic studies in the past decade has unraveled the genetic landscape and molecular etiology of AML. The approval of several novel drugs for targeted therapy, including midostaurin, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab–ozogamicin, and CPX351 by the US Food and Drug Administration has widened the treatment options for clinicians treating AML. This review focuses on some of these novel therapies and other promising agents under development, along with key clinical trial findings in AML.

ObjectivesAzathioprine (AZA) is a commonly used immunosuppressant in patients with autoimmune diseases. The toxic side effect to AZA (myelosuppression, hair loss, and oral ulcers) are highly unpredictable which can be life threatening if not identified earlier and dose adjustments made or the drug is withdrawn.Case presentationHere we report a case series of five patients with severe toxicity while on treatment with AZA for autoimmune hemolytic anemia (n=1) and Immune thrombocytopenia (n=4). The common thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) variants (TPMT*2, *3A, *3B) were not present in these patients. However, all these patients had the NUDT15 415C>T variant that has been reported to explain serious toxicity to thioguanine in Asian patients.ConclusionsOur report suggests pre-emptive genotype-based dosing of AZA could reduce adverse toxicity and hence better outcome.

The success of differentiation therapy is limited to acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and approaches to overcome the differentiation block in non-M3 AML have been unsuccessful. Nuclear hormone receptors (NHR) belong to ligand-inducible transcription factors that govern many cellular functions like differentiation, metabolism, and development. Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (RXRA) is a class of NHR that, when activated by all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), successfully alleviates differentiation block in APL. To identify the NHRs/cofactors that could mediate or prevent differentiation in AML, we examined the differentially expressed NHRs and cofactors between ATRA sensitive (ATs) (NB4 and HL60) vs. ATRA resistant (ATr) AML cell lines (KG1a, Hel, K562, MV4-11, and OCI-AML3). Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (NRIP1), a corepressor known to prevent transactivation of ligand-activated NHRs preferentially, was one of the top upregulated targets in the ATr cell lines (3.5 fold increase in RNA expression, figure 1a ). Immunoblot analysis also showed a significant increase in NRIP1 protein expression in the ATr than ATs cell lines (Figure 1b). Further, probing for NRIP1 expression in the publicly available TCGA and MILE AML study cohorts showed decreased NRIP1 expression in the APL cohort compared to other AML subtypes. Methylation profile from CCLE database of the NRIP1 promoter in AML cell lines showed ATs cell lines to be highly methylated compared to the ATr cell lines, suggesting the involvement of NRIP1 in mediating differentiation block in non-M3 AML (Figure 1c). To further dissect the role of NRIP1 in mediating this differentiation block, we carried out experiments in the AML cell line KG1a (having primitive blast features, high expression of NRIP1, and unresponsive to ATRA). Using CRISPR-cas9, we developed an NRIP1 knock-out (KO) cell line (Figure 1d). NRIP1 KO cell line showed a significant reduction in proliferation rate (Doubling time 26.2 vs. 36.5Hrs p&lt;0.05). Further, cell cycle analysis revealed that NRIP1 KO leads to increased accumulation of cells in the G0 phase than in the S-phase (Figure 1e & f). We next assessed the sensitivity of the NRIP1 WT/KO cells to retinoic acids ATRA and bexarotene. Cells were treated with 1µM ATRA / bexarotene or in combination for 72 hours and evaluated for differentiation using CD11b marker by flow cytometry. NRIP1 KO alone leads to a marginal increase in basal CD11b expression compared to the WT cells (Mean CD11b expression 2.03% Vs 0.91%). ATRA treatment further increased the CD11b expression to 3.8% in KO cells compared to 1.6% in the WT cells. A similar increase in CD11b expression was observed in bexarotene-treated cells (3.7% Vs 1.24%). Combination of ATRA with bexarotene showed a 3-fold increase in CD11b expression in the KO cells compared to the WT (23.9% Vs 7.2%, Figure 1g). NRIP1 KO diminishes its repressive action on ligand-activated RARA (ATRA activated) and RXRA (Bexarotene-activated), thereby allowing synergistic differentiation induction by retinoic acids in AML cells. This study suggests a potential mechanism of differentiation inhibition mediated by corepressor NRIP1 in AML cells unresponsive to retinoic acids. Further in-depth analyses of molecular pathways governed by NRIP1 during ligand activation of NHRs are warranted to design differentiation therapies for AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mathews: Christian Medical College: Patents & Royalties: US 2020/0345770 A1 - Pub.Date Nov.5, 2020; AML: Other: Co-Inventor.