The design of supported embankments on soft soil is a common challenge for civil engineers. This article aims to evaluate the performance of three advanced constitutive models for predicting the behavior of soft soils, i.e., hardening soil, hardening soil model with small-strain stiffness, and soft soil creep. A case study of a rigid inclusion-supported embankment is used for this purpose. Plaxis 3D program was adopted to predict the settlements in subsoil layers and vertical stresses in the load transfer platform. Comparison between field measurements and result of Plaxis 3D modeling was performed. Results demonstrate that soft soil creep model yields predictions in a good agreement with the field measurements, while hardening soil small strain model gives slightly worst predictions.
Expansive soils exist in many countries worldwide, and their characteristics make them exceedingly difficult to engineer. Due to its significant swelling and shrinkage characteristics, expansive soil defies many of the stabilization solutions available to engineers. Differential heave or settlement occurs when expansive soil swells or shrinks, causing severe damage to foundations, buildings, roadways, and retaining structures. In such soils, it is necessary to construct a foundation that avoids the adverse effects of settlement. As a result, building the structure’s foundations on expansive soil necessitates special consideration. Helical piles provide resistance to uplift in light structures. However, they may not fully stabilize foundations in expansive soils. A granular anchor pile is another anchor technique that may provide the necessary resistance to uplift in expansive soils using simpler methods. This review and numerical study investigate the fundamental foundation treatments for expansive soils and the behavior of granular anchors and helical piles. Results indicate that granular anchor piles performed better than helical piles for uplift and settlement performance. For heave performance, the granular anchor and helical piles perform nearly identically. Both achieve heave reductions greater than 90% when L/H > 1.5 and D = 0.6 m.
This work aims to highlight gravity segmental retaining walls with their varied advantages. The paper investigates the dynamic behavior analysis of segmental retaining walls. The stability analysis is conducted on the basis of a pseudo-static Mononobe-Okabe theory that provides safety factors against sliding and overturning failure. The results demonstrate that the crucial safety factor of internal stability is the safety factor against overturning. Moreover, the positive wall inclination angle contributes to an improvement in the stability of the segmental retaining walls and the effect of the vertical seismic coefficient on the stability can be disregarding. Finally, a new equation is proposed for the elementary design of the segmental retaining walls.
The construction of tunnels in densely populated urban areas poses a significant challenge in terms of anticipating the settlement that may result from tunnel excavation. This paper presents a new and more realistic modeling method for tunnel excavation using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM). This method is compared with other reference modeling methods using a validated model of a subsurface tunnel excavated by a TBM with a slurry shield. A parametric study is conducted to investigate the impact of key parameters, including structure width, foundation depth, eccentricity, load on the structure, overburden depth, and tunnel diameter, on tunnel–soil–structure interaction and the resulting structure settlements. The results reveal that the tunnel diameter, eccentricity, and overburden depth have a significant impact on structure settlements, with values of 22.5%, 17%, and 7.1%, respectively. Finally, the paper proposes an equation for predicting the maximum settlement of a structure, considering the critical parameters. The validity of the equation is evaluated by comparing its results with the outputs from various case studies, including a newly validated model, two real-life case studies, and centrifuge tests. The results indicate a high level of consistency between the calculated and measured settlements.
Soft soils with unfavorable properties can be improved using various ground-improvement methods. Among these methods, geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments are considered a reliable option for challenging ground conditions and time-bound projects. Nevertheless, the intricate load transfer mechanism of the GRPS embankment presents challenges due to the multiple interactions among its components. To overcome the limitations of current design methods that do not fully account for all interactions, a simplified design method has been developed for GRPS embankments. This method uses numerical analysis to predict pile load efficiency and geosynthetic tension. In this study, a validated model of the GRPS embankment, which incorporates certain simplifications for design purposes, was adopted. Based on this simplified model, a database of load efficiency and geosynthetic tension was collected to derive the design equations. The design method employed six parameters, namely, pile cap width, pile spacing, embankment height, oedometric modulus of the subsoil, geosynthetic stiffness, and embankment fill unit weight. The design process utilized Plaxis 3D and Curve Expert software. The results showed reasonable agreement between the findings of the proposed design method and the field measurements of eight case studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.