Introduction
Choroidal thickness is known to vary in various systemic diseases. In the current study, we aim to report the differences in choroidal thickness in thyroid eye disease (TED) and normals and its discriminatory value for differentiating various stages of TED.
Methods
Prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional imaging study. In an institutional practice, 102 eyes of 51 patients were included and divided into five groups: normal controls (C), inactive TED (I), active TED (A), non-inflammatory active TED (NIA) and systemic thyroid disorder but no TED (SYS). Choroidal images were acquired using the swept-source optical coherence tomography (Topcon DRI OCT Triton) with automatic layer segmentation which provided an automatic measurement of the subfoveal choroidal thickness and the mean in nine subfields based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Youden index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were reported.
Results
Central choroidal thickness in the A group was 279±37.52 microns and in the NIA group was 302.5±59.22 microns. Both were comparable to each other and significantly higher than the C, I and SYS groups (p<0.001). All ETDRS sub-fields showed significant AUROC to distinguish NIA from I. Most significant Youden index was for the inner nasal and central ETDRS subfields (0.55 and 0.61 respectively). Inner nasal sub-field showed 100% specificity while the central sub-field, showed 86.5% for predicting NIA. At a choroidal thickness of >266 microns, the central sub-field had the strongest discriminatory potential to predict NIA.
Conclusion
Choroidal thickness is greater in active and non-inflammatory active TED. The inner nasal and central ETDRS sub-fields have value in differentiating the non-inflammatory active TED eyes from the inactive eyes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.