Acute bleeding after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was investigated in 1,402 patients receiving transplants at Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 1, 1986 and June 30, 1995. Bleeding categorization was based on daily scores of intensity used by the blood transfusion service. Moderate and severe episodes were analyzed for bleeding sites. Analysis of the cause of death and the interval of the bleeding episode to outcome endpoints was recorded. Survival estimates were computed for 1,353 BMT patients. The overall incidence was 34%. Minor bleeding was seen in 10.6%, moderate bleeding was seen in 11.3%, and severe bleeding was seen in 12% of all patients. Fourteen percent of patients had moderate or severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 6.4% had moderate or severe hemorrhagic cystitis, 2.8% had pulmonary hemorrhage, and 2% had intracranial hemorrhage. Sixty-one percent had 1 bleeding site and 34.4% had more than 1 site. Moderate and severe bleeding was more prevalent in allogeneic (31%) and unrelated patients (62.5%) compared with autologous patients (18.5%). Significant distribution of incidence was found among the different diagnoses, but not by disease status in acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bleeding was associated with significantly reduced survival in allogeneic, autologous, and unrelated BMT and in each disease category except multiple myeloma. Survival was correlated with the bleeding intensity, bleeding site, and the number of sites. Although close temporal association was evident to mortality, bleeding was recorded as the cause of death in only the minority of cases compared with other toxicities after BMT (graft-versus-host disease, infections, and preparative regimen toxicity). Acute bleeding is a common complication after BMT that is profoundly associated with morbidity and mortality. Although bleeding was not a direct cause of death in the majority of cases, it has a potential prognostic implication as a predictor of poor outcome in clinical assessment of patients after BMT.

489 Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (5-Fluoracil + Irinotecan + Oxaliplatin) is considered the standard treatment for fit patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Disease progression after FOLFIRINOX invariably occurs, and there is no definition on the optimal strategy for the second-line treatment of these pts. Gemcitabine is effective for advanced pancreatic cancer as first-line treatment, but its role after FOLFIRINROX progression is unknown. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of gemcitabine for treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer after progression to FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Single-institution, retrospective analysis of all pts consecutively diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer between January/2010, and October/2015, who received Gemcitabine as second line chemotherapy after progression to first line chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX. Tumor responses were assessed through RECIST 1.1. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Results: 28 pts were included in our analysis. Median age was 55 years (38-75), and 19 pts (67%) were male. The median ECOG was 1 (0-2). Pts received a median of 9 cycles of FOLFIRINOX as first line treatment (1-27), with an objective (ORR) response rate of 39%. The median number of second-line Gemcitabine cycles was 3 (1-8), with an ORR of 3%, and a 17% rate of disease control (stable disease + partial response). Five patients (18%) discontinued second line Gemcitabine due to toxicities and the remaining 23 (82%) due to disease progression. Median overall survival was 5.6 months (0,36-11,5) and median progression-free survival was 2 months (0.2-7.7). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities with Gemcitabine were experienced by 18% of the patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Gemcitabine after progression to FOLFIRINOX presented a modest activity on the present study, with prospective trials being necessary to further assess this issue. Due to the palliative goal of the treatment, with the objective of improving patient´s quality of life, the significant risk of treatment-related adverse events and the low efficacy of Gemcitabine should be considered before prescribing Gemcitabine routinely as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Introduction: Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast, particularly malignant phyllodes tumor (mPT), is a rare fibroepithelial neoplasm. A complex diagnosis is based on pathologic, radiologic, and clinical findings, with controversies about what is the best therapeutic strategy. Objective: Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic aspects of this rare tumor. Conclusions: mPT is a rare presentation of breast cancer and a challenge in clinical practice. A multidisciplinary approach should take into account some aspects like pathogenic mutations and hereditary syndromes. Oncologic surgery is the fundamental approach, and the use of adjuvant therapies is still controversial due to the lack of clinical trials. Treatment recommendations should be individualized according to patient risk and preferences. Prospective studies are fundamental to clarifying the best treatment for these tumors.