No abstract

BackgroundFertility rates in Europe are among the lowest in the world, which may be attributed to both biological and lifestyle factors. Cost and reimbursement of fertility treatments vary across Europe, although its citizens enjoy wide access to fertility care. Since few regional studies evaluating public support for fertility treatment exist, we conducted the Listening IVF and Fertility in Europe (LIFE) survey to ascertain public perception of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete donation as a treatment for infertility among European men and women.Methods and findingsThis survey was distributed via an online questionnaire to 8,682 individuals who were voluntary participants in an online research panel residing in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, or the UK. The survey covered items to determine respondents’ beliefs regarding IVF and its success, the need for public funding, the use of IVF among modern families with different lifestyles, and the support for gamete donation. Results were analyzed by age, country of origin, sex, and sexual orientation. A total of 6,110 (70% of total) men and women responded. Among all respondents, 10% had undergone IVF treatment and 48% had considered or would consider IVF in case of infertility. Respondents estimated IVF mean success rate to be 47% and over half of respondents believed that availability of IVF would encourage people to delay conception. Although 93% of respondents believed that IVF treatment should be publicly funded to some extent, a majority believed that secondary infertility or use of fertility treatments allowing to delay parenthood should be financed privately. Survey respondents believed that the mean number of stimulated IVF cycles funded publicly should be limited 2 to 3 (average 2.4). 79% of respondents were willing to pay for IVF if needed with a mean amount of 5,400 € for a child brought to life through IVF. According to respondents, mean minimum and maximum ages for IVF should be 29 and 42 years old, respectively. The current survey showed support for egg and sperm donation (78%), for IVF in single women (61%) and for same-sex female couples (64%). When analyzing the results per group (i.e., sex, age, sexual orientation, and countries), youngest age groups, homosexuals, bisexuals, German respondents, and men had similar overall positive attitudes and beliefs toward IVF and opinions on public funding. Perceived limits to availability were stronger in women.ConclusionOverall, the survey results demonstrate a positive attitude among respondents in an online panel toward IVF, gamete donation, and support for public funding for fertility treatment. These findings could potentially drive discussions between patients and prescribers to explore IVF treatment and among legislators and payers to support public funding for these procedures.

Covalent attachment of biotin provides a useful method to label cell surface proteins. Subsequent to biotinylation, the protein can be purified by immunoprecipitation with a specific antibody, followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After transfer to a membrane by electroblotting, the biotinylated protein can be detected by probing with labeled streptavidin. This technique has been used to investigate recombinant human insulin receptors expressed on the surface of murine NIH-3T3 cells. Biotinylation of the extracellular domain with an impermeant reagent did not impair the ability of an antibody directed against an epitope in the intracellular domain to immunoprecipitate insulin receptors. In contrast, biotinylation reduced the avidity of a polyclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor. Nevertheless, by increasing the concentration of the antireceptor antibody, it was possible to successfully immunoprecipitate the biotinylated receptor. Furthermore, biotinylated receptors retained the ability to bind insulin and undergo insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation and internalization. The use of enzyme-labeled streptavidin enables the use of chemiluminescence techniques to detect the receptors, thus obviating the need to employ radioactivity. Just as the technique is useful to study cell surface insulin receptors, it can be adapted to investigate other cell surface receptors and proteins.