OBJECTIVES
The development of late-onset right ventricular failure (LoRVF) that occurs months after a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is implanted is a clinical problem that warrants investigation. Our goal was to study the incidence, clinical manifestations and prognosis of LoRVF in a population of patients who received an LVAD as bridge to transplantation.
METHODS
Data were analysed from 97 consecutive patients who received an LVAD as bridge to transplantation and underwent a right heart catheterization at least 3 months after receiving an LVAD implantation. LoRVF was defined if both haemodynamic criteria of a central venous pressure >16 mmHg and a cardiac index <2.3 l/min/m2 were present. Clinical and echocardiographic variables, hospitalizations for heart failure and survival were compared between patients with and without LoRVF.
RESULTS
LoRVF was diagnosed in 13% of patients after a median time of 11 months. Patients with LoRVF presented preoperative worse right ventricular (RV) dilatation and severe tricuspid regurgitation. LORVF was also associated with postoperative RV dilatation, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. LoRVF resulted in increased brain natriuretic peptide levels and the need for diuretics, lower haemoglobin levels and a higher rate of atrial fibrillation and gastrointestinal bleeding. The rate of hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with LoRVF was 46%, and 15% required an urgent transplantation due to refractory RV failure. LoRVF decreased global survival and survival free from hospitalizations for heart failure (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
LoRVF after the implantation of an LVAD as bridge to transplantation is associated with higher morbidity and lower survival. The results suggest that the routine use of a right heart catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography may contribute to an early diagnosis before further severe complications due to refractory RV failure might occur.
ID number of the IRB approval
AZ-2019-521 on 10 July 2019.
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an expanding therapy in end-stage heart failure today. Although LVAD therapy bears the potential to normalize cardiac output, a majority of patients show a severely impaired physical condition at the time of LVAD implantation. To date, no validated standardized training protocol is available, and established practices to effectively improve LVAD patients’ exercise tolerance is lacking. This study sought to investigate exercise capacity quantified by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and a standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients after LVAD implantation.
Methods
We enrolled 30 end-stage heart failure patients who had received an LVAD implantation 20.7 ± 7.6 days prior to examination, mean age 54.9 ± 7.8 years, 26 males (87 %). Exercise tolerance was assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) for maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, followed by a standardized (6MWT).
Results
Patients showed peak oxygen uptake values of 8.3 ± 2.4 ml/min/kg at a mean workload of 46.7 ± 11.3 watts and a mean anaerobic threshold of 6.7 ± 1.7 ml/min/kg at a workload of 32.6 ± 6.9 watts. Mean standardized 6-minute walking distance was at 183.8 ± 71.4 meters. There were no adverse events during exercise testing.
Conclusions
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and standardized 6MWT show severely impaired cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients after LVAD implantation, warranting further studies for dedicated training protocols, specifically focusing on LVAD patients to improve exercise tolerance at an acceptable safety profile.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.