No abstract

Scant information exists on the role of thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). We studied 65 patients with EHPVO, 500 with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs, and 700 healthy controls referred for thrombophilia screening, including the search for gain-of-function mutations in genes encoding coagulation factor V (factor V Leiden) and prothrombin (prothrombin G20210A); antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency; and hyperhomocysteinemia. At least one abnormality in the thrombophilia screening was found in 40% of patients with either EHPVO or lower limb DVT and in 13% of controls, for odds ratios of 4.0 (95% CI, 2.3-7.0) and 4.4 (95% CI, 3.3-5.9), respectively. Statistically significant associations with EHPVO were observed for the prothrombin G20210A mutation (odds ratio, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.8-17.5) and the deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S taken together (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1-18.0). The odds ratio for the prothrombin G20210A was approximately twice that for lower limb DVT. Patients with factor V Leiden had an odds ratio for EHPVO of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.1-6.4) and for lower limb DVT of 7.5 (95% CI, 4.4-13.0). The odds ratio for EHPVO in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia was 2.0 (95% CI, 0.9-4.9). At variance with lower limb DVT, oral contraceptive use was not associated with an increased risk of EHPVO. Myeloproliferative disorders were diagnosed in 35% of patients with EHPVO. In conclusion, the risk for EHPVO is increased in the presence of thrombophilia resulting from the prothrombin G20210A mutation and from the deficiencies of the naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins, but not from factor V Leiden. (HEPATOLOGY 2005;41:603-608.)

Background Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Topical hemostatic products have been developed for endoscopic use to help in the management of difficult bleeding. Our aim was to demonstrate the ease of use, safety, and efficacy of PuraStat, a novel hemostat, to control AGIB. Methods We describe 77 patients (41 men) who were treated for acute upper and lower AGIB in a 2-year period. In 50 patients, bleeding occurred as a complication of a previous endoscopic procedure, predominantly endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, in the other 27 patients, it derived from peptic ulcers, angiodysplasia, cancers, and surgical anastomoses. Bleeding was spurting in 13 of the 77 patients and oozing in 64. PuraStat was used after the failure of at least two conventional hemostatic methods. Results A mean of 2.6 conventional hemostatic methods had been attempted prior to the application of PuraStat. PuraStat achieved successful hemostasis in 90.9 % of patients. In 41 patients, once hemostasis was obtained with PuraStat, endoscopists further stabilized hemostasis by using at least one additional method. Recurrence of bleeding was observed in eight patients (10.4 %). In 16 patients with intraprocedural bleeding, it was possible to complete the procedures (14 EMR, 2 ERCP) after PuraStat hemostasis. No adverse events related to PuraStat were recorded. Conclusions PuraStat is feasible, safe, and effective in controlling different types of gastrointestinal hemorrhage after failure of conventional hemostatic methods. Its application also does not hinder continuing endotherapy.

No abstract