No abstract

No abstract

Tumor-necrosis-factor alpha (TNF-alpha) is a major mediator of the inflammatory immune response and may play an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Increased TNF-alpha levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood were found in patients with chronic progressive MS and patients with acute relapses, but not in the stable form of the disease. Considering the association of different TNF-alpha alleles with diverse autoimmune diseases we sequenced the TNF-alpha promotor region (-674 to +201) of 23 patients with relapsing/remitting MS, of 27 patients with chronic progressive MS (21 patients had primary progressive course and six patients had a secondary progressive course) and of 22 healthy controls, who had no history of MS in their families. In three of 21 patients (14%) with primary chronic progressive MS a homozygous point-mutation at position -308 could be demonstrated where guanine (G) was substituted by adenosine (A). This mutation could neither be detected in patients with relapsing/remitting MS nor in healthy controls. However, 40% of the patients with relapsing/remitting MS and 43% of the primary chronic progressive MS patients were heterozygous at position -308 for G/A, whereas only 32% of healthy controls showed this heterogeneity. The genetic variations were demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplification of the TNF-alpha promotor-region and consecutive direct automatic sequencing. Functional analysis of the promoter region using the chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase (CAT) assay revealed spontaneous production with the homozygous mutation at -308 only.

This study aimed at comparing the accuracy of two commercial neuronavigation systems. Error assessment and quantification of clinical factors and surface registration, often resulting in decreased accuracy, were intended. Active (Stryker Navigation) and passive (VectorVision Sky, BrainLAB) neuronavigation systems were tested with an anthropomorphic phantom with a deformable layer, simulating skin and soft tissue. True coordinates measured by computer numerical control were compared with coordinates on image data and during navigation, to calculate software and system accuracy respectively. Comparison of image and navigation coordinates was used to evaluate navigation accuracy. Both systems achieved an overall accuracy of <1.5 mm. Stryker achieved better software accuracy, whereas BrainLAB better system and navigation accuracy. Factors with conspicuous influence (P<0.01) were imaging, instrument replacement, sterile cover drape and geometry of instruments. Precision data indicated by the systems did not reflect measured accuracy in general. Surface matching resulted in no improvement of accuracy, confirming former studies. Laser registration showed no differences compared to conventional pointers. Differences between the two systems were limited. Surface registration may improve inaccurate point-based registrations but does not in general affect overall accuracy. Accuracy feedback by the systems does not always match with true target accuracy and requires critical evaluation from the surgeon.