It is widely accepted that even a single acute noise exposure at moderate intensity that induces temporary threshold shift (TTS) can result in permanent loss of ribbon synapses between inner hair cells and afferents. However, effects of repeated or chronic noise exposures on the cochlear synapses especially medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent synapses remain elusive. Based on a weeklong repeated exposure model of bandwidth noise over 2-20 kHz for 2 hours at seven intensities (88 to 106 dB SPL with 3 dB increment per gradient) on C57BL/6J mice, we attempted to explore the dose-response mechanism of prolonged noise-induced audiological dysfunction and cochlear synaptic degeneration. In our results, mice repeatedly exposed to relatively low-intensity noise (88, 91, and 94 dB SPL) showed few changes on auditory brainstem response (ABR), ribbon synapses, or MOC efferent synapses. Notably, repeated moderate-intensity noise exposures (97 and 100 dB SPL) not only caused hearing threshold shifts and the inner hair cell ribbon synaptopathy but also impaired MOC efferent synapses, which might contribute to complex patterns of damages on cochlear function and morphology. However, repeated high-intensity (103 and 106 dB SPL) noise exposures induced PTSs mainly accompanied by damages on cochlear amplifier function of outer hair cells and the inner hair cell ribbon synaptopathy, rather than the MOC efferent synaptic degeneration. Moreover, we observed a frequency-dependent vulnerability of the repeated acoustic trauma-induced cochlear synaptic degeneration. This study provides a sight into the hypothesis that noise-induced cochlear synaptic degeneration involves both afferent (ribbon synapses) and efferent (MOC terminals) pathology. The pattern of dose-dependent pathological changes induced by repeated noise exposure at various intensities provides a possible explanation for the complicated cochlear synaptic degeneration in humans. The underlying mechanisms remain to be studied in the future.
Among the vertebrate lineages with different hearing frequency ranges, humans lie between the low-frequency hearing (1 kHz) of fish and amphibians and the high-frequency hearing (100 kHz) of bats and dolphins. Little is known about the mechanism underlying such a striking difference in the limits of hearing frequency. Prestin, responsible for cochlear amplification and frequency selectivity in mammals, seems to be the only candidate to date. Mammalian prestin is densely expressed in the lateral plasma membrane of the outer hair cells (OHCs) and functions as a voltage-dependent motor protein. To explore the molecular basis for the contribution of prestin in hearing frequency detection, we collected audiogram data from humans, dogs, gerbils, bats, and dolphins because their average hearing frequency rises in steps. We generated stable cell lines transfected with human, dog, gerbil, bat, and dolphin prestins (hPres, dPres, gPres, bPres, and nPres, respectively). The non-linear capacitance (NLC) of different prestins was measured using a whole-cell patch clamp. We found that the Qmax/Clin of bPres and nPres was significantly higher than that of humans. The V1/2 of hPres was more hyperpolarized than that of nPres. The z values of hPres and bPres were higher than that of nPres. We further analyzed the relationship between the high-frequency hearing limit (Fmax) and the functional parameters (V1/2, z, and Qmax/Clin) of NLC among five prestins. Interestingly, no significant correlation was found between the functional parameters and Fmax. Additionally, a comparative study showed that the amino acid sequences and tertiary structures of five prestins were quite similar. There might be a common fundamental mechanism driving the function of prestins. These findings call for a reconsideration of the leading role of prestin in hearing frequency perception. Other intriguing kinetics underlying the hearing frequency response of auditory organs might exist.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.