The use of autologous sural nerve grafts is still the current gold standard for the repair of peripheral nerve injuries with wide substance losses, but with a poor rate of functional recovery after repair of mixed and motor nerves, a limited donor nerve supply, and morbidity of donor site. At present, tubulization through the muscle vein combined graft, is a viable alternative to the nerve autografts and certainly is a matter of tissue engineering still open to continuous development, although this technique is currently limited to a critical gap of 3 cm with less favorable results for motor function recovery. In this report, we present a completely new tubulization method, the amnion muscle combined graft (AMCG) technique, that consists in the combination of the human amniotic membrane hollow conduit with autologous skel-etal muscle fragments for repairing the substance loss of peripheral nerves and recover both sensory and motor functions. In a series of five patients with loss of substance of the median nerve ranging 3-5 cm at the wrist, excellent results graded as S4 in two cases, S31 in two cases, and S3 in one case; M4 in four cases and M3 in one case were achieved. No iatrogenic damage due to withdrawal of a healthy nerve from donor site was observed. This technique allows to repair extensive loss of substance up to 5 cm with a good sensory and motor recovery. The AMCG thus may be considered a reasonable alternative to traditional nerve autograft in selected clinical condi-tions. V C ,
Background and objectives: Complex limb traumas are commonly treated with microsurgical reconstruction and free flaps. However, complications are frequent in patients affected by a previous trauma or comorbidity, atheromasia and a single valid vessel. Free flap reconstruction is indeed a challenging procedure in complex injuries, which may increase the risk of limb ischemia. The Arteriovenous loop (AVL) technique may be considered an efficient alternative treatment. We herein report our procedure and previous research regarding the AVL method using a two-step reconstruction in cases of complex high-energy limb injuries. Materials and Methods: In this single center retrospective cohort study, all the patients from 2014 to 2018 who underwent to AVL reconstruction were assessed. A total of six patients were included in the study for traumatic limb trauma. The two-stage technique was performed each time. The age and sex of patient, the time between stage one and two, the length of AVL loop and rate of free flap success were evaluated. Results: A total of seven AVL reconstructions were performed. The mean age of patients was 36 years old. Eight free flaps were performed; six free flaps were transferred to the vascular loops. The average time between stage one and two was 13 days. The mean length of the pedicle was 25 cm for the upper limb and 33.7 cm for the lower limb. All the free flaps successfully take root. In one case, a surgical revision was required the second day post-operatory due to venous congestion. Conclusions: AVL is a useful and safe technique in microsurgical reconstruction which will prevent vascular complications. Our investigations suggest the efficacy and feasibility of a two-step intervention in acute post-traumatic events. A single-step procedure should be preferred in chronic situation and oncologic reconstruction.
Background: Distal Phalanx (DP) fractures are the most common hand injuries. Bone fixation associated with soft tissue reconstruction, is often required to ensure more effective outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare functional outcomes of DP fractures surgically treated with crossed manual drilled 23 Gauge needles vs crossed Kirschner-wires (k-wire). Methods: Clinical data included analysis of patient demographics, range of motion (ROM), and complications. Radiographic assessment considered fracture type, location, fracture displacement, and radiographic union. Functional outcomes analysis was performed.The statistical significance was assessed at the level of probability lower than 5%. Results: A total of 60 patients from 2012 to 2015 were retrospectively enrolled and among them 12 patients suffering from diabetes or current smokers. A total of 60 DP fractures were treated, 32 with needles (group A) and 28 with k-wire fixation (group B). Time to union, showed in different time points, was significantly lower in group A (≤ 40 days, p = 0.023*) compared to group B. ROM of the distal interphalangeal joint at six months follow-up was 60°in group A and 40°in group B. A significant improvement was observed (p = 0.001*) in the 23 G needle treated group. Functional outcome analysis showed that VAS was significantly lower in group A compared to group B (p = 0.023*). Conclusion: Our study showed that the 23 G needle yielded satisfactory results in terms of time to union and range of motion compared to k-wire fixation especially for tuft and shaft DP fractures. Therefore, should be a valid alternative to k-wire fixation in selected patients.
The treatment of severe wounds of the extremities, characterized by large posttraumatic tissue loss, represents a clinical problem difficult to resolve, especially when the lesion is surrounded by large areas of ischemic distrophic tissue which progressively aggravate and extend the initial lesion, with frequent exposure of bone and joint structures making the amputation of the limb an inevitable outcome. The authors present their experience based on combined treatments by medical support methods such as hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and vacuum-assisted closure therapy (VAC) and microsurgical reconstruction of the limbs, within a precise therapeutic protocol. The use of this protocol in appropriate times and ways allowed us to successfully treat severe posttraumatic sequelae of the limbs, avoiding the delayed healing typical of these pathologies, both on the donor site of the flap and on the repaired area, and avoiding unsuitable microsurgical reconstruction of limbs, allowing satisfactory morpho-functional restoration and a reduction of the hospitalization period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.