Purpose
The purpose of this analysis is to predict worsening post‐treatment normal tissue toxicity in patients undergoing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) therapy and to quantitatively identify which diagnostic, anatomical, and dosimetric features are contributing to these outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective study of APBI treatments was performed using 32 features pertaining to various stages of the patient's treatment journey. These features were used to inform and construct a Bayesian network (BN) based on both statistical analysis of feature distributions and relative clinical importance. The target feature for prediction was defined as a measurable worsening of telangiectasia, subcutaneous tissue induration, or fibrosis when compared against the observed baseline. Parameter learning for the network was performed using data from the 299 patients included in the ACCEL trial and predictive performance was measured. Feature importance for the BN was quantified using a novel information‐theoretic approach.
Results
Cross‐validated performance of the BN for predicting toxicity was consistently higher when compared against conventional machine learning (ML) techniques. The measured BN receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was 0.960±$\,{\pm}\,$0.013 against the best ML result of 0.942±$\,{\pm}\,$0.021 using five‐fold cross‐validation with separate test data across 100 trials. The volume of the clinical target volume, gross target volume, and baseline toxicity measurements were found to have the highest feature importance and mutual dependence with normal tissue toxicity in the network, representing the strongest contribution to patient outcomes.
Conclusions
The BN outperformed conventional ML techniques in predicting tissue toxicity outcomes and provided deeper insight into which features are contributing to these outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.