A micropapillary component may be a manifestation of aggressive behaviour, as shown by frequent micrometastasis, for stage I lung adenocarcinomas.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE Application for a residency position in neurosurgery is a highly competitive process. Visiting subinternships and interviews are integral parts of the application process that provide applicants and programs with important information, often influencing rank list decisions. However, the process is an expensive one that places significant financial burden on applicants. In this study, the authors aimed to quantify expenses incurred by 1st-year neurosurgery residents who matched into a neurosurgery residency program in 2014 and uncover potential trends in expenses. METHODS A 10-question survey was distributed in partnership with the Society of Neurological Surgeons to all 1st-year neurosurgery residents in the United States. The survey asked respondents about the number of subinternships, interviews, and second looks (after the interview) attended and the resultant costs, the type of program match, preferences for subinternship interviews, and suggestions for changes they would like to see in the application process. In addition to compiling overall results, also examined were the data for differences in cost when stratifying for region of the medical school or whether the respondent had contact with the program they matched to prior to the interview process (matched to home or subinternship program). RESULTS The survey had a 64.4% response rate. The mean total expenses for all components of the application process were US $10,255, with interview costs comprising the majority of the expenses (69.0%). No difference in number of subinternships, interviews, or second looks attended, or their individual and total costs, was seen for applicants from different regions of the United States. Respondents who matched to their home or subinternship program attended fewer interviews than respondents who had no prior contact with their matched program (13.5 vs 16.4, respectively, p = 0.0023) but incurred the same overall costs (mean $9774 vs $10,566; p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Securing a residency position in neurosurgery is a costly process for applicants. No differences are seen when stratifying by region of medical school attended or contact with a program prior to interviewing. Interview costs comprise the majority of expenses for applicants, and changes to the application process are needed to control costs incurred by applicants.

We examined the prognostic significance of tumor budding in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, particularly in comparison to other routine pathological findings. Fifty-six cases who underwent an esophagectomy were reviewed. We defined tumor budding as an isolated single cancer cell or a cluster composed of fewer than five cancer cells and divided these into two grades; low-grade (< 5 budding foci) and high-grade (> or = 5 budding foci) within a microscopic field of x 200. There were 22 (39.3%) and 34 (60.7%) cases with low- and high-grade budding, respectively. There were significant differences in the patients with low- and high-grade budding in relation to tumor size, pT stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement, and AJCC stage (P < 0.05). The 3-year survival rates of the patients with low- and high-grade budding were 72.3% and 30.7%, respectively (P = 0.04). We propose that tumor budding may be a pathological marker suggesting high malignancy potential and decreased postoperative survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.