hltonD eFF nd wrgoldD wF nd tokesD gFF nd rsovD vF nd hykeD eFF nd edmsD FF nd ellrdD F nd erendsD rFiF nd etkinsonD xF nd ettigD tF nd frnettD FtF nd frnettD FvF nd fttersonD wF nd fernthezD F nd forns trD rFF nd frekenridgeD eF nd frinerD tFF nd frourdD iF nd gmpellD tFiF nd grlsonD eFiF nd glgueD tFtF nd gurryD fFfF nd higneultD FeF nd hu¡ eEvouertD rF nd isterrookD hFtF nd prnziD hFeF nd priedrihD rFqF nd punderD F nd quthierD wFF nd qownD eFF nd rrrisD uFvF nd r¡ etuD fF nd rooyerD FF nd tenningsD gFiF nd tohnsonD wFhF nd uehewD eFiF nd uelleyD FiF nd uerrD hF nd uingD iFvF nd ujeldsenD uFuF nd uneleD eFF nd vjeunesseD F nd vkemnD FF nd vmotheD wF nd vrsonD F nd vvoieD wF nd voopeD rFwF nd vowellD FF nd vusrdiD fFeF nd wnzD vF nd wwrtinD sF nd xixonD pFgF nd yhiettiD F nd rkhillD wFeF nd iperD hFtFF nd ronkD eFqF nd ihrdD FtFrF nd idgeD tFgF nd ossD wF nd oyD wF nd emnD eF nd hwD tF nd teD FF nd ellerD tFF nd hompsonD FfF nd horleifsonD rFvF nd ttingD hFtF nd eilletteD tFtF nd rdD fFgF nd eddleD FuF nd right trD rFiF @PHPHA 9en updted rdioronEsed ie mrgin hronology for the lst deglition of the xorth emerin se heet gomplexF9D uternry siene reviewsFD PQR F pF IHTPPQF

Landscape analysis, mapping, sedimentology, shallow geophysics, and borehole data are integrated to better understand the complex landform-sediment geometries and event sequences of the Oak Ridges Moraine, southern Ontario. A model for the origin of the Oak Ridges Moraine is based on the recognition that the moraine is built on a high-relief, erosional surface (unconformity) consisting of drumlin uplands and a network of deep, steep-walled, interconnected valleys (tunnel channels). The development of the moraine is thought to have occurred in four stages: I, subglacial sedimentation; II, subaqueous fan sedimentation; III, fan to delta sedimentation; IV, ice-marginal sedimentation. The model traces the transition from subglacial to proglacial conditions during moraine formation and examines the order and timing of sedimentation. It is thought that the early stages of moraine construction are better exposed in the east; in the west, these stages are buried by later stages.

Accurately reconstructing the paleogeography of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3; ca. 57,000 to ca. 29,000 yr B.P.) is critical for understanding glacial growth toward the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), refining sealevel histories and studying the Earth system response to rapid climate change events. Here, we present a geochronological data set useful for testing hypotheses of global sea level and refining ice sheet configuration through this interval. Data (n = 735) span the entire MIS 3 interval and consist of 14 C determinations (n = 651), cosmogenic exposure ages (n = 52), and optically stimulated luminescence dates (n = 32). On that basis, we hypothesize that the central region of the LIS underwent a dramatic reduction in ice from ~52-40 ka.

Well-dated paleorecords from periods prior to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) are important for validating models of ice-sheet build-up and growth. However, owing to glacial erosion, most Late Pleistocene records lie outside of the previously glaciated region, which limits their ability to inform about the dynamics of paleo-ice sheets. Here, we evaluate new and previously published chronology data from the Missinaibi Formation, a Pleistocene-aged deposit in the Hudson Bay Lowlands (HBL), Canada, located near the geographic center of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS). Available radiocarbon (AMS = 44, conventional = 36), amino acid (n = 13), uranium-thorium (U-Th, n = 14), thermoluminescence (TL, n = 15) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL, n = 5) data suggest that an ice-free HBL may have been possible during parts of Marine Isotope Stage 7 (MIS 7; ca. 243,000 to ca. 190,000 yr BP), MIS 5 (ca. 130,000 to ca. 71,000 yr BP) and MIS 3 (ca. 29,000 to ca. 57,000). While MIS 7 and MIS 5 are 2 well-documented interglacial periods, the development of peat, forest bed and fluvial deposits dating to MIS 3 (n = 20 radiocarbon dates; 4 TL dates, 3 OSL dates), suggests that the LIS retreated and remained beyond, or somewhere within, the boundaries of the HBL during this interstadial. Ice sheet models approximate the margin of the LIS to Southern Ontario during this time, which is 700 km south of the HBL. Therefore, if correct, our data help constrain a significantly different configuration and dynamicity for the LIS than previously modelled. We can find no chronological basis to discount the MIS 3 age assignments. However, since most data originate from radiocarbon dates lying close to the reliable limit of this geochronometer, future work on dating the Missinaibi Formation using other geochronological methods (e.g. U-Th, OSL) is necessary in order to confirm the age estimates and strengthen the boundaries of the LIS during this period.

A succession of stratigraphic codes (1933, 1961, 1983) has guided attempts to refine classifications and naming of stratigraphic units for Quaternary deposits of the Great Lakes region. The most recent classifications for the late Quaternary of the Lake Michigan lobe (1968) and the eastern Great Lakes (1972) have been widely used, but later work has created the need for revision. An attempt has been made to integrate the two previous classifications following the diachronic system of the 1983 Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature. A new nomenclature for the higher, more broadly recognized units was presented in 1997. We here present the diachronic nomenclature for finer subdivisions recognized in the eastern and northern Great Lakes. Following the interglacial Sangamon Episode, the three parts of the Wisconsin Episode are further subdivided as follows: the Ontario Subepisode (former Early Wisconsinan) comprises the Greenwood, Willowvale, and Guildwood phases; the Elgin Subepisode (former Middle Wisconsinan) comprises the Port Talbot, Brimley, and Farmdale phases; and the Michigan Subepisode (former Late Wisconsinan) consists of Nissouri, Erie, Port Bruce, Mackinaw, Port Huron, Two Creeks, Onaway, Gribben, Marquette, Abitibi, and Driftwood phases. Succeeding interglacial time to the present is the Hudson Episode.

No abstract

A geological model is presented for the glacial deposits of the Oak Ridges Moraine area of southern Ontario. The model contains four units as well as incised channels dissecting the strata. Channels eroded through the Newmarket Till, a regional aquitard, provide hydraulic connection between the aquifers of the overlying Oak Ridges Moraine and those of the underlying lower drift. Buried channels filled with silt, sand, and gravel, and preferentially oriented north-northeast-southsouthwest, are indicated by drill core and seismic reflection profiles. The model, with two successful case studies, has significant implications for groundwater resource development in the Greater Toronto Area. Groundwater flow to the lower drift may occur through channels so that groundwater resources in the lower drift may be more productive than previously suggested. Gravel sequences within channels may be targets for high yield wells. Further investigations are required to examine buried channel locations, distribution, and sediment fill.

The Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) was the largest ice sheet during the last glacial period. An accurate representation of its behavior during the last deglaciation is critical to understanding its influence on and response to a changing climate. We use 10Be dating and Bayesian modeling to track the recession of the southwest sector of the Labrador Dome of the LIS along an ~500-km-long transect west of Lake Superior during the last deglaciation. This transect reflects terrestrial ice-margin retreat and crosses multiple moraine sets, with the southwestern part of the transect deglaciated by ca. 19 ka and the northeastern part deglaciated by ca. 10 ka. The predominant behavior of the ice margin during this interval is near-constant retreat with retreat rates varying between ~59 m/a and 38 m/a. The moraine sets mark standstills and/or readvances that in total constitute only ~17% of the retreat interval. The spatial and temporal pattern of ice-margin retreat tracked here differs from existing reconstructions that are based on using isochrons to define ice-margin positions. Acknowledging the uncertainties associated with the modeled ages of ice-margin retreat, we suggest that the overall retreat pattern is consistent with forcing by a gradual increase in Northern Hemisphere, high-latitude summer insolation. The pattern of ice-margin retreat is inconsistent with Greenland ice-core temperature records, and thus these records may not be suitable to drive models of the LIS.