Summary
The relative contributions of sources of carbon in soils, such as throughfall, litter, roots, microbial decay products and stable organic fractions, to dissolved organic C are controversial. To identify the origin of dissolved organic C, we made use of a 4‐year experiment where spruce and beech, growing on an acidic loam and on a calcareous sand, were exposed to increased CO2 that was depleted in 13C. We traced the new C inputs from trees into dissolved organic C, into water‐extractable organic C, and into several particle‐size fractions. In addition, we incubated the labelled soils for 1 year and measured the production of dissolved organic C and CO2 from new and old soil C. In the soil solutions of the topsoil, the dissolved organic C contained only 5–10% new C from the trees. The δ13C values of dissolved organic C resembled those of C pools smaller than 50 µm, which strongly suggests that the major source of dissolved organic C was humified old C. Apparently, throughfall, fresh litter and roots made only minor contributions to dissolved organic C. Water‐extractable organic C contained significantly larger fractions of new C than did the natural dissolved organic C (25–30%). The δ13C values of the water‐extractable organic C were closely correlated with those of sand fractions, which consisted of little decomposed organic carbon. The different origin of dissolved and water‐extractable organic C was also reflected in a significantly larger molar UV absorptivity and a smaller natural 13C abundance of dissolved organic C. This implies that the sampling method strongly influences the characteristics and sources of dissolved organic C. Incubation of soils showed that new soil C was preferentially respired as CO2 and only a small fraction of new C was leached as dissolved organic C. Our results suggest that dissolved organic C is produced during incomplete decomposition of recalcitrant native C in the soils, whereas easily degradable new components are rapidly consumed by microbes and thus make only a minor contribution to the dissolved C fraction.
Migration of radionuclides in soils and their transfer to edible plants are usually estimated using volume-averaged bulk concentrations. However, radionuclides might not be homogeneously distributed in soils due to heterogeneous water flow and solute transport. One important cause of heterogeneous transport is preferential flow. The aim of this study was to investigate the spatial distribution of radionuclides in the soil in relation to preferential flow paths and to assess the possible consequences for their transfer from soil to plants. We identified the preferential flow paths in a forest soil by staining them with a blue dye, and we compared radionuclide activity in samples from the stained preferential flow paths with those from the unstained soil matrix. The activities of the atmospherically deposited radionuclides 137 Cs, 210 Pb, 239,240 Pu, 238 Pu, and 241 Am were enriched in the preferential flow paths by a factor of up to 3.5. Despite their different depositional histories, the distribution of the radionuclides between preferential flow paths and matrix was similar. Our findings indicate increased transport of radionuclides through the preferential flow paths, representing a possible risk of groundwater contamination. Furthermore, enrichment of radionuclides in the preferential flow paths might influence the uptake by plants. The heterogeneous radionuclide distribution in the soil and the more intense rooting in the preferential flow paths can be incorporated into soil-to-plant transfer models. Taking the correlated radionuclide and root distribution between the two flow regions into account provides a more physical and biological basis for the calculation of plant activities with transfer models than using the homogeneously mixed bulk soil activities as input parameters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.