International audienceThe seasonal climate drivers of the carbon cycle in tropical forests remain poorly known, although these forests account for more carbon assimilation and storage than any other terrestrial ecosystem. Based on a unique combination of seasonal pan-tropical data sets from 89 experimental sites (68 include aboveground wood productivity measurements and 35 litter productivity measurements), their associated canopy photosynthetic capacity (enhanced vegetation index, EVI) and climate, we ask how carbon assimilation and aboveground allocation are related to climate seasonality in tropical forests and how they interact in the seasonal carbon cycle. We found that canopy photosynthetic capacity seasonality responds positively to precipitation when rainfall is < 2000 mm yr(-1) (water-limited forests) and to radiation otherwise (light-limited forests). On the other hand, independent of climate limitations, wood productivity and litterfall are driven by seasonal variation in precipitation and evapotranspiration, respectively. Consequently, light-limited forests present an asynchronism between canopy photosynthetic capacity and wood productivity. First-order control by precipitation likely indicates a decrease in tropical forest productivity in a drier climate in water-limited forest, and in current light-limited forest with future rainfall < 2000 mm yr(-1)
<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The seasonal climate drivers of the carbon cycle in tropical forests remain poorly known, although these forests account for more carbon assimilation and storage than any other terrestrial ecosystem. Based on a unique combination of seasonal pan-tropical data sets from 89 experimental sites (68 include aboveground wood productivity measurements and 35 litter productivity measurements), their associate canopy photosynthetic capacity (enhanced vegetation index, EVI) and climate, we ask how carbon assimilation and aboveground allocation are related to climate seasonality in tropical forests and how they interact in the seasonal carbon cycle. We found that canopy photosynthetic capacity seasonality responds positively to precipitation when rainfall is < 2000 mm.yr<sup>&#8722;1</sup> (water-limited forests) and to radiation otherwise (light-limited forests); on the other hand, independent of climate limitations, wood productivity and litterfall are driven by seasonal variation in precipitation and evapotranspiration respectively. Consequently, light-limited forests present an asynchronism between canopy photosynthetic capacity and wood productivity. Precipitation first-order control indicates an overall decrease in tropical forest productivity in a drier climate.</p>
As condições meteorológicas desempenham importante função no comportamento de queimadas e incêndios florestais na Amazônia. Em anos de secas severas, as queimadas utilizadas no manejo da terra podem sair do controle e queimar extensas áreas de vegetação. Parâmetros meteorológicos e focos de calor foram utilizados para avaliar a suscetibilidade da vegetação ao fogo no sul do Amazonas em um ano sem seca (2004) e com seca severa (2005). O número de células suscetíveis ao fogo foi 84% maior em 2005 (72%), comparando com 2004 (39%). Em 2005, o número de células com focos aumentou 66% e o número de focos 121%. Em 2004, 65% dos focos ocorreram com precipitação entre 40 e 90 mm, 96%, com temperatura média entre 26 e 28 ºC, e 89% com umidade inferior a 65%. Em 2005, 83% dos focos ocorreram com precipitação inferior a 70 mm, 96% com temperatura média entre 24 e 28 ºC e 99% com umidade inferior a 65%. Os parâmetros meteorológicos apresentaram tendência de separação entre anos, mas não entre áreas com e sem focos (PC1 = 84%). Houve maior amplitude de variação desses parâmetros no ano com seca severa, proporcionando um tempo mais quente e seco, potencializando a suscetibilidade da vegetação ao fogo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.