Liver grafts from ECD can be used to dramatically reduce wait list time with outcomes comparable to those for SD without resorting to living donor liver transplantation.

Liver, pancreas, and kidney allografts preserved in histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions have similar clinical outcomes. This study compares HTK and UW in a large number of standard criteria donor (SCD) and extended criteria donor (ECD) livers at a single center over 5 years. All adult, cadaveric liver and liver-kidney transplants performed between July 1, 2001 and June 30, 2006 were reviewed (n ϭ 698). There were 435 livers (62%) categorized as ECD for severe physiologic stress and 70 (10%) because of old age. Recipient outcomes included perioperative death or graft loss and overall survival. Liver enzymes were analyzed for the first month post-transplant. Biliary complications were assessed through chart review. Overall, 371 donor livers were preserved in HTK (53%), and 327 were preserved in UW (47%). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the primary outcome measures comparing HTK and UW. The HTK group overall had a higher day 1 median aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, but the two groups were similar in function thereafter. HTK was superior to UW in protection against biliary complications. Kaplan-Meier graft survival curves failed to demonstrate a significant difference in SCD or ECD livers. In conclusion, HTK and UW are not clinically distinguishable in this large sample of liver transplants, although HTK may be protective against biliary complications when compared to UW. These findings persisted for both SCD and ECD livers. Given the lower cost per donor for HTK, this preservation solution may be preferable for general use. Liver Transpl 14: 365-373, 2008. © 2008 AASLD. Received June 11, 2007 accepted September 19, 2007. An increasing number of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers have adopted histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution as their primary solid organ preservation solution. HTK has been shown to have clinical outcomes equivalent to those of University of Wisconsin (UW) solution while providing a significant cost savings. 1 Specifically, previously published papers have demonstrated that HTK and UW have similar immediate graft function and graft and patient survival in kidney, 2-4 pancreas, 5-8 and liver transplantation. 9,10 No previous study has compared HTK and UW for extended criteria donors (ECDs) to determine if one solution is superior to the other in certain high-risk donor subgroups. This article presents the largest published prospective single-center comparison of HTK and UW in liver transplant patients and provides a subgroup comparison of a large volume of ECD liver recipients.

Posttransplant measures of early liver function and risk of failure, up to 1-year posttransplant, did not differ significantly based on peak or terminal donor serum sodium levels. These results suggest that donor serum sodium level likely has little clinical impact on posttransplant liver function.

BackgroundTimely tourniquet placement may limit ongoing hemorrhage and reduce the need for blood products. This study evaluates if prehospital tourniquet application altered the initial transfusion needs in arterial injuries when compared with a non-tourniquet control group.MethodsExtremity arterial injuries were queried from our level I trauma center registry from 2013 to 2017. The characteristics of the cohort with prehospital tourniquet placement (TQ+) were described in terms of tourniquet use, duration, and frequency over time. These cases were matched 1:1 by the artery injured, demographics, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism of injury to patients arriving without a tourniquet (TQ−). The primary outcome was transfusion within the first 24 hours, with secondary outcomes of morbidity (rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, compartment syndrome), amputation (initial vs. delayed), and length of stay. Statistical tests included t-test and χ2 for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with p<0.05 considered as significant.ResultsExtremity arterial injuries occurred in 192 patients, with 69 (36%) having prehospital tourniquet placement for an average of 78 minutes. Tourniquet use increased over time from 9% (2013) to 62% (2017). TQ+ patients were predominantly male (81%), with a mean age of 35.0 years. Forty-six (67%) received blood transfusion within the first 24 hours. In the matched comparison (n=69 pairs), TQ+ patients had higher initial heart rate (110 vs. 100, p=0.02), frequency of transfusion (67% vs. 48%, p<0.01), and initial amputations (23% vs. 6%, p<0.01). TQ+ patients had increased frequency of initial amputation regardless of upper (n=43 pairs) versus lower (n=26 pairs) extremity involvement; however, only upper extremity TQ+ patients had increased transfusion frequency and volume. No difference was observed in morbidity, length of stay, and mortality with tourniquet use.DiscussionTourniquet use has increased over time in patients with extremity arterial injuries. Patients having prehospital tourniquets required a higher frequency of transfusion and initial amputation, without an increase in complications.Level of evidenceTherapeutic study, level IV.