Background The impact of COVID-19 on physical and mental health and employment after hospitalisation with acute disease is not well understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of COVID-19-related hospitalisation on health and employment, to identify factors associated with recovery, and to describe recovery phenotypes. MethodsThe Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a multicentre, long-term follow-up study of adults (aged ≥18 years) discharged from hospital in the UK with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, involving an assessment between 2 and 7 months after discharge, including detailed recording of symptoms, and physiological and biochemical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was done for the primary outcome of patient-perceived recovery, with age, sex, ethnicity, body-mass index, comorbidities, and severity of acute illness as covariates. A posthoc cluster analysis of outcomes for breathlessness, fatigue, mental health, cognitive impairment, and physical performance was done using the clustering large applications k-medoids approach. The study is registered on the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN10980107). Findings We report findings for 1077 patients discharged from hospital between March 5 and Nov 30, 2020, who underwent assessment at a median of 5•9 months (IQR 4•9-6•5) after discharge. Participants had a mean age of 58 years (SD 13); 384 (36%) were female, 710 (69%) were of white ethnicity, 288 (27%) had received mechanical ventilation, and 540 (50%) had at least two comorbidities. At follow-up, only 239 (29%) of 830 participants felt fully recovered, 158 (20%) of 806 had a new disability (assessed by the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning), and 124 (19%) of 641 experienced a health-related change in occupation. Factors associated with not recovering were female sex, middle age (40-59 years), two or more comorbidities, and more severe acute illness. The magnitude of the persistent health burden was substantial but only weakly associated with the severity of acute illness. Four clusters were identified with different severities of mental and physical health impairment (n=767): very severe (131 patients, 17%), severe (159, 21%), moderate along with cognitive impairment (127, 17%), and mild (350, 46%). Of the outcomes used in the cluster analysis, all were closely related except for cognitive impairment. Three (3%) of 113 patients in the very severe cluster, nine (7%) of 129 in the severe cluster, 36 (36%) of 99 in the moderate cluster, and 114 (43%) of 267 in the mild cluster reported feeling fully recovered. Persistently elevated serum C-reactive protein was positively associated with cluster severity.Interpretation We identified factors related to not recovering after hospital admission with COVID-19 at 6 months after discharge (eg, female sex, middle age, two or more comorbidities, and more acute severe illness), and four different recovery phenotypes. The severity of physical and mental health impairments were closely related, whereas cognitive health impairments w...
In selected patients with severe emphysema, lung-volume-reduction surgery can improve FEV1, walking distance, and quality of life. Whether it reduces mortality is uncertain.
Fibrosing alveolitis, a condition characterized by a poor prognosis and a limited response to treatment, is readily identified by thin-section computed tomography (CT). Fibrotic and inflammatory histologic results, obtained at open lung biopsy, both have characteristic CT patterns. To evaluate whether CT could predict prognosis and response to therapy, we examined the CT appearances of 76 patients with lone cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and 66 patients with fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis. CT abnormalities were categorized as predominantly a ground-glass pattern (Grade 1), mixed (Grade 2), or predominantly a reticular pattern (Grade 3). In cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, 4-yr survival was highest in association with CT Grade 1 and higher with CT Grade 2 than with CT Grade 3, independent of the extent of abnormal lung on CT, duration of dyspnea, or severity of depression of DLCO or FVC, p < 0.001. A response to therapy in previously untreated cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis was seen most frequently with CT Grade 1 and more frequently with CT Grade 2 than with CT Grade 3, p < 0.025. In systemic sclerosis, CT appearances were not predictive of 4-yr survival; a response to therapy was seen more frequently with CT Grade 2 (three of seven patients) than with CT Grade 3 (zero of six patients). These data have shown that CT appearances are of prognostic value in fibrosing alveolitis and that they are likely to play an increasing role in disease-staging in this condition.
Fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis (FASSc) is considered to be histologically and radiologically indistinguishable from lone cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA). To date, the natural history of the two diseases has not been compared directly in large groups of patients followed at a single institution. We evaluated the survival of 205 patients with CFA and 68 patients with FASSc. Deaths during the follow-up period were reported in 142 patients with CFA (70%) and in 11 patients with FASSc (16%). Unadjusted survival from the onset of dyspnea was less in CFA than in FASSc (odds ratio, 3.3; p < 0.001); this difference persisted after adjustment for age of onset of dyspnea and smoking history. Survival from presentation was less in CFA (odds ratio approximately 3.3) after adjustment for age of presentation, smoking history, and initial pulmonary function indices. These differences persisted when analysis was confined to patients with histologic confirmation of fibrosing alveolitis and after adjustment for treatment. In patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) of the lungs, survival was less in CFA after adjustment for extent of abnormal lung on CT and CT pattern of disease (odds ratio, 3.9; p < 0.001). These findings indicate that despite their histologic and radiologic similarities, lone CFA and FASSc have different courses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.