Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Arthrofibrosis is a major obstacle to restoring joint function after trauma. The objective of this study was to evaluate montelukast, forskolin, and triamcinolone as possible means of prophylaxis against the formation of arthrofibrosis. Forty-eight rats underwent surgical knee trauma with post-operative immobilization in full flexion. The treatment groups were: control (CTL), oral montelukast (3.75 mg/kg/day) (MLK), intra-articular forskolin injections (0.6 mg/kg) (FSK), and intra-articular triamcinolone injections (0.68 mg/kg) (STR). Rats were sacrificed after 14 days and femorotibial contracture angles were measured with the posterior capsule intact and with the posterior capsule cut. A 0.015Nm extension moment was applied to the knee. All treatment groups had significant reductions in contracture angle compared to the control. Mean contractures with the posterior capsule intact were 32˚(CTL), 20˚(MLK), 22˚(FSK), and 7˚(STR). Contractures with the posterior capsule cut were 28˚(CTL), 19˚(MLK), 20˚(FSK), and 5˚(STR). The STR group was significantly better than FSK and MLK. Triamcinolone injections provided dramatic reductions in stiffness. Both forskolin and montelukast provided significant, though lesser, reductions in stiffness. While the triamcinolone contracture angles were significantly better, the novel treatments of forskolin and montelukast provided encouraging results and should be studied further. ß
Background: Occult instability of lateral compression type-1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries may be determined with a fluoroscopic stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) performed in the operating room. We hypothesized that LC1 injuries, similar to some fractures of the extremities, could be radiographically stressed for stability in the emergency department (ED). Our primary objective was to determine if stress examination of LC1 fractures could be safely and accurately performed in the ED and could be tolerated by patients.Methods: A prospective, consecutive series of 70 patients with minimally displaced LC1 pelvic injuries (<10-mm displacement on presentation) underwent stress examinations performed by the on-call orthopaedic resident in the ED radiology suite. The stress examination series included static 40°inlet, internal rotation stress inlet, and external rotation stress inlet views. Pelvic fractures that had positive stress results ( ‡10 mm of overlap of the rami) were indicated for a surgical procedure. These fractures also underwent EUA in order for the 2 techniques to be compared.Results: All patients tolerated the ED stress examination without general anesthetic or hemodynamic instability. Fiftyseven patients (81%) had negative stress results and were allowed to bear weight. All patients with negative stress results who had 3-month follow-up went on to radiographic union without substantial displacement. For the patients with a positive stress result in the ED, the mean displacement was 15.15 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8 to 19.4 mm) for the ED stress test and 15.60 mm (95% CI, 11.7 to 19.4 mm) for the EUA (p = 0.86). Two patients with a negative ED stress test did not mobilize during their hospitalization and underwent EUA and conversion to a surgical procedure. Thus, a total of 11 patients underwent both stress testing in the ED and EUA; no patient had a positive result on one test but a negative result on the other.Conclusions: ED stress examination of LC1 injuries is a safe and reliable method to determine pelvic ring stability. The displacement measured in the ED stress examination is similar to the displacement measured under general anesthesia. Furthermore, a negative ED stress examination predicts successful nonoperative treatment. Given the results of this study, we encourage the use of stress examination in the ED for LC1-type injuries involving complete sacral fractures only. Widescale adoption of this streamlined protocol may substantially diminish cost, anesthetic risk, and potential operations for patients.Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Lateral compression type-1 (LC1) fractures are common injuries, accounting for approximately 50% of all pelvic ring injuries 1-3 . They occur secondary to a lateral compressive force on the pelvis causing medialization and internal rotation of the hemipelvis 1,3,4 . These injuries have historically been treated nonoperatively, but current surgical indications a...
The subscapularis is the largest and most powerful muscle of the rotator cuff. Occupying the vast majority of the subscapular fossa, it is the only internal rotator of the rotator cuff. The subscapularis innervation is classically taught as a dual innervation of 1 upper subscapular and 1 lower subscapular nerve arising from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus. However, there is a large amount of research that suggests there is significant variance in the innervation of the muscle from multiple upper subscapular nerves to multiple lower subscapular nerves arising from various portions of the plexus. Although one of the main functions of the subscapularis is to internally rotate the humerus, there is substantial evidence that displays its importance in glenohumeral stability as well. The insertion of the subscapularis is both tendinous as well as muscular. The more superior tendinous portion inserts on the lesser tuberosity while the more muscular portion inserts inferior to the less tuberosity. The medial to lateral spread of the insertion is quite variable ranging from only on the lesser tuberosity to merging with fibers from the supraspinatus. Understanding the anatomy of the subscapularis improves subscapularis management during shoulder arthroplasty including techniques for takedown, release, and repair.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations –citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.