Abstract:The pharmacodynamics and elimination kinetics of escalating doses (1.5-12 mg/kg) of hyaluronan (HA) infusions were studied in healthy human volunteers. Metabolic breakdown of serum HA and associated adverse events were monitored throughout the study. The HA-binding capacities of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD19+ Blymphocytes and CD14+ peripheral blood monocytes (PBMC) were also quantified. Breakdown of infused HA into small fragments (<37 kDa) were not detected and adverse events related to HA infusions were infrequent and non-serious in nature. Binding of FITC-HA was greatest to CD14+ monocytes and the binding capacity of these cells for FITC-HA was significantly increased by the final HA infusion. At that time, binding to CD14+ monocytes was related to serum HA levels suggesting a close relationship between PK and PD of serum HA. Drug level analysis demonstrated a disproportional increase in the area under the serum concentration vs. time curve with increasing HA dose. The observed non-linear HA kinetics appears to result from a saturable elimination process as revealed by pharmacokinetic modeling. These results have implications for the use of injected HA for drug delivery or in imaging applications.
INTRODUCTION:
MAP US was a global multicenter randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of RHB-104, a fixed-dose oral combination of clarithromycin, rifabutin and clofazimine against MAP infection, in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). We report evaluations of efficacy, symptom improvement and exposure-response by individual RHB-104 components.
METHODS:
Patients with active CD (CDAI ≥220 and ≤450) and failure with conventional therapies were randomized 1:1 to RHB-104 or placebo for up to 52 Wks. Concomitant corticosteroids, immunosuppressives (IS) and anti-TNF agents were permitted. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (CDAI <150) at Wk 26. Secondary endpoints included clinical response at Wk 26 (CDAI decrease ≥100 points), early remission at Wk 16 and remission at Wk 52. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analysis was performed based on PK assessments and remission at Wk 26; a subset of patients underwent colonoscopy at baseline and Wk 26.
RESULTS:
331 subjects were randomized at 92 sites. The proportion achieving remission at Wk 26 (36.7% vs 23%, P = .007), remission at Wk 16 (42.2% vs 29.1%, P = .015) and response at Wk 26 (44% vs 30.9%, P = .017) were significantly greater with RHB-104 vs placebo. The superiority of RHB-104 was more pronounced in patients receiving RHB-104 with concomitant anti-TNF or IS treatment. Despite the small numbers (n = 35), a greater proportion of RHB-104 patients achieved endoscopic response by SES-CD 50 (28.6% vs 4.8%, P = .11). Differences in fecal calprotectin (FCP) increased over time (Figure 1); improvements in PRO-2 symptoms appeared by Wk 4 and reached significance by Wk 16 (Figure 2). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving RHB-104 achieved clinical remission with at least a 50% reduction from baseline in either FCP or CRP concentration at Wk 16 (25.9% vs 9.7%, P = .0002), Wk 26 (21.1% vs 9.1%, P = .0003) and Wk 52 (16.9% vs 7.9%, P = .02). Exposure-response modeling demonstrated the combination of the individual components of RHB-104 contributed to the higher rate of remission compared to placebo and that the probability of achieving remission was most sensitive to clofazimine.
CONCLUSION:
RHB-104 demonstrated meaningful improvement in efficacy and biomarkers of active inflammation, with exposure-response for each drug component, early onset of response and benefit in patients with and without concomitant anti-TNF or IS therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.