Introduction: The opioid crisis persists, and in the context of this urgency and new practice guidelines, the practice of buprenorphine (BUP) prescription is expanding across Canadian emergency departments (EDs). The objective of this study was to identify current knowledge, attitudes and behaviours to managing opioid use disorder (OUD) in the ED, including barriers and facilitators to prescribing BUP. Methods: Forty ED staff physicians were randomly invited to participate from an urban Toronto ED which recently received continuing medical education in addictions, and whose hospital established an addictions follow-up clinic. Individual semi-structured interviews with the 19 physicians who self-selected to participate were grounded in phenomenology, allowing for in-depth accounts of participants’ lived experience and viewpoints on their role in addressing OUD. Thematic analysis was achieved through multiple readings; themes were coded using Dedoose software by two researchers. Themes were further organized as facilitators, barriers, and proposed solutions. Results: Opioid withdrawal management in the ED varied significantly between these practitioners in the same practice group. Facilitators to treating withdrawal and initiating BUP in the ED were rooted in three contributors to physician empowerment: knowledge about OUD and BUP, positive patient and provider experience with substitution therapy in the past, and exposure to physician champions to guide their practice. Systems-level facilitators included timely access to follow-up care and an available order set. Barriers included provider inexperience: missing subtle presentations of withdrawal, lacking feedback on treatment effectiveness, and reported uncertainty about the protocol from nursing staff. The ED environment also limits time to counsel effectively and discourages taking up a bed both to wait for withdrawal onset and for BUP induction. Other barriers were concerns about precipitating withdrawal, prescribing a chronic medication in acute care, and patient attitudes. Conclusion: This is the first study describing barriers and facilitators to addressing OUD and prescribing BUP in the ED. These findings suggest a role for home induction, involvement of allied health professionals in BUP counseling, and heightened continuing medical education. Results will inform departmental efforts across Canada to implement BUP prescribing as standard of care for patients in opioid withdrawal.

Objective Opioid-related deaths are increasing at alarming rates in Canada, with a 34% increase from 2016 to 2017. Patients with opioid use disorder often visit emergency departments (ED), presenting an opportunity to engage patients in treatment. Buprenorphine-naloxone is first-line treatment for opioid use disorder, but current management in the ED is unknown. This study aimed to characterize opioid use disorder management in the ED. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of emergency physicians across Canada. A survey was circulated electronically to the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians members. Participants were asked about their current management practices, satisfaction, and helpfulness of resources. SAS (version 9.4) was used for statistical analysis. We dichotomized Likert-scale responses to approximate relative risk ratios via a log binomial analysis. Results The survey was completed by 179 participants for a response rate of 11.1%; 143 (79.9%) physicians treated patients with opioid use disorder more than once a week. Only 7% (n = 13) of respondents always/often gave buprenorphine in the ED. Referral to an addiction clinic where patients were seen quickly was deemed the most helpful (90.5%, n = 162). Physicians who reported satisfaction with opioid use disorder management were four times more likely to prescribe buprenorphine in the ED or as an outpatient script (RR = 4.41, CI = 2.33–8.33, p < 0.01; RR = 4.51, CI = 2.21–9.22, p < 0.01). Conclusion This study found that buprenorphine is not frequently prescribed in the ED setting, which is incongruent with the 2018 guidelines. Care coordination and on-site support were helpful to ED physicians. Hospitals should use knowledge translation strategies to improve the care of patients with an opioid use disorder.

BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is detrimental to mental health. The Domestic Violence Survivor Assessment (DVSA), which includes a mental health assessment, is often used to evaluate abuse survivors in a counseling situation. The DVSA seeks to outline the cognitive state of women as per the stages of change as they attempt to move toward a life with no IPV.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore predictors of change in mental health and distress among women who entered a women's shelter more than once.MethodsWomen entering a women's shelter more than once over a 3-year period were assessed by a trained social worker using the DVSA. A logistic regression analysis examined relationships between the chosen characteristics and the participants’ mental health through the DVSA stages of change.ResultsWe analyzed complete data for 94 women who entered the shelter a mean of 3.3 times (range 2–8) over a mean period of 16.1 days (range: 1–391). Thirty-six women (36/94; 38.3%) progressed through the stages. The average number of visits among women who progressed through the stages was 4. Our multivariable logistic regression showed women who had more visits to the shelter were almost twice as likely to progress through the stages compared to women who entered the shelter fewer times (OR=1.928; 95% CI=1.292–2.877; p=0.001). In the univariate analysis, only increased number of visits was significantly associated with progressing through the stages of change (OR=1.694; 95% CI=1.237–2.322; p=0.001). The other factors were not significantly associated with a change in mental health and distress (p>0.05).ConclusionWomen who enter women's shelters more frequently may be more likely to progress through the DVSA mental health stages compared to other women. Women's shelters may be helpful in assisting progression through the stages of change, thereby improving their mental health after abuse.

Background Emergency departments (EDs) across Canada are increasingly prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this study was to identify the current knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of ED physicians on the management of OUD in the ED, including barriers and facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine. Methods We purposefully selected emergency physicians from one ED in Toronto which had recently received education on OUD management and had a new addiction medicine follow-up clinic, to participate in semi-structured interviews. We used semi-structured interviews to explore experiences with patients with OUD, conceptions of role of the ED in addressing OUD, and specifically ask about perceptions and experience on using buprenorphine for opioid withdrawal. Our analysis was informed by constructivist grounded theory to help uncover contextualized social processes and focus on what people do and why they do it. Two researchers independently coded transcripts using an iterative constant comparative and interpretative approach. Results Results fell broadly into facilitators and barriers. Generally, management of OUD in the ED varied significantly. Physician-level facilitators to treating opioid withdrawal with buprenorphine included: knowledge about OUD an7d buprenorphine, positive experiences with substitution therapy in the past, and the presence of physician champions. Systems-level facilitators included timely access to follow-up care and pre-printed order sets. Barriers included provider inexperience, lack of feedback on treatment effectiveness, limited time to counsel patients, and pressure to discharge patients quickly. Additional barriers included concerns about precipitating withdrawal, prescribing a chronic medication in acute care, and patient attitudes. Conclusion This study describes barriers and facilitators to addressing OUD and prescribing buprenorphine in a Canadian ED. These findings suggest a role for additional provider education, involvement of allied health professionals in counseling, and mentorship by physician champions in the department.

No abstract