doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
The lockdown due to coronavirus pandemic may exacerbate depressive symptoms, experts argue. Here we evidence that students, a high-risk category for mental disorders, report on average worse depressive symptoms than 6 months before isolation. The prospective data reported herein should alert clinician of a possible aggravation as well as new-onsets of depressive symptoms in students.
Introduction Prospective studies on mental health of students showed that young adults enroled in university are affected by poorer mental health than other working peers or adults, and this condition is responsible for a large proportion of disability-adjusted life-years Methods We enrolled 1388 students at the baseline (and 557 completed follow-up after six months) who reported their demographic information and completed self-report questionnaires on depressive, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. We applied multiple regression modelling and supervised machine learning to evince associations and predict the risk factors of poorer mental health at baseline and follow-up Results Approximately one out of five students reported severe depressive symptoms and/or suicidal ideation. An association of economic worry with depression was evidenced at the beginning of the study (when there was a high frequency of worry OR = 3.11 [1.88 - 5.15]) and during followup.Supervised machine learning exhibited high accuracy in predicting the students who maintained well-being (balanced accuracy = 0.85) or absence of suicidal ideation, but its performance was almost null in identifying those whose symptoms worsened. Conclusions Students' severe mental health problems are reaching worrying percentages, and few demographic factors can be leveraged to predict poor mental health outcomes. Further research including people with lived experience is crucial to assess students' needs and improve the prediction of those at risk of developing worse symptoms.
Aims Prospective studies on the mental health of university students highlighted a major concern. Specifically, young adults in academia are affected by markedly worse mental health status than their peers or adults in other vocations. This situation predisposes to exacerbated disability-adjusted life-years. Methods We enroled 1,388 students at the baseline, 557 of whom completed follow-up after 6 months, incorporating their demographic information and self-report questionnaires on depressive, anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. We applied multiple regression modelling to determine associations – at baseline – between demographic factors and self-reported mental health measures and supervised machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of poorer mental health at follow-up, by leveraging the demographic and clinical information collected at baseline. Results Approximately one out of five students reported severe depressive symptoms and/or suicidal ideation. An association of economic worry with depression was evidenced both at baseline (when high-frequency worry odds ratio = 3.11 [1.88–5.15]) and during follow-up. The random forest algorithm exhibited high accuracy in predicting the students who maintained well-being (balanced accuracy = 0.85) or absence of suicidal ideation but low accuracy for those whose symptoms worsened (balanced accuracy = 0.49). The most important features used for prediction were the cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. However, while the negative predictive value of worsened symptoms after 6 months of enrolment was 0.89, the positive predictive value is basically null. Conclusions Students’ severe mental health problems reached worrying levels, and demographic factors were poor predictors of mental health outcomes. Further research including people with lived experience will be crucial to better assess students’ mental health needs and improve the predictive outcome for those most at risk of worsening symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.