Objectives The current reference standard for diagnosing LAA thrombi is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), a semiinvasive technique. We aimed to devise an optimal protocol for cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in diagnosing left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), using TEE as reference standard. Methods Two hundred sixty consecutive patients referred for radiofrequency ablation for AF were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent CCT and TEE within 2 hours. The CCT protocol included one standard angiographic phase and three delayed acquisitions at 1-, 3-, and 6-min after contrast injection. Thrombi were defined as persisting defects at 6-min delayed acquisition. Results TEE demonstrated spontaneous contrast in 52 (20%) patients and thrombus in 10 (4%). In 63 patients (24%), CCT demonstrated LAA early filling defects at angiographic phase. Among them, 15 (6%) had a persistent defect at 1-min, 12 (5%) at 3-min, and 10 (4%) at 6-min. All 10 thrombi diagnosed on TEE were correctly identified by delayed CCT, without any false positives. For all phases, sensitivity and negative predictive were 100%. Specificity increased from 79% for the angiographic phase to 100% at 6-min. Positive predictive value increased from 16% to 100%. Estimated radiation exposure was 2.08 ± 0.76 mSv (mean ± standard deviation) for the angiographic phase and 0.45 ± 0.23 mSv for each delayed phase. Conclusion A CCT protocol adding a 6-min delayed phase to the angiographic phase can be considered optimized for the diagnosis of LAA thrombi, with a low radiation dose. Key Points • In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation referred for ablation procedures, a cardiac CT examination comprising an angiographic-phase acquisition and, in case of filling defects, a 6-min delayed phase may help reduce the need for transesophageal echocardiography. • Cardiac CT would provide morphological and volumetric data, along with the potential to exclude the presence of thrombi in the left atrial appendage.
Purpose:To compare the accuracy of detection and quantification of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with a synthetic inversion-recovery (IR) approach with that of conventional IR techniques.
Materials and Methods:This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
Results:Seventeen of the 43 patients (39%) had LGE patterns consistent with myocardial infarction. The sensitivity and specificity of synthetic magnitude and phase-sensitive IR techniques in the detection of LGE were 90% and 95%, respectively, with patient-based analysis and 94% and 99%, respectively, with segment-based analysis. The area of LGE measured with synthetic IR techniques showed excellent agreement with that of conventional techniques (4.35 cm 2 6 1.88 and 4.14 cm 2 6 1.62 for synthetic magnitude and phase-sensitive IR, respectively, compared with 4.25 cm 2 6 1.92 and 4.22 cm 2 6 1.86 for conventional magnitude and phase-sensitive IR, respectively; P . .05). Interreader agreement was excellent for the detection (k . 0.81) and quantification (bias range, 20.34 to 0.40; P . .05) of LGE.
Conclusion:The accuracy of the T1 map-based synthetic IR approach in the detection and quantification of myocardial LGE in patients with previous myocardial infarction was similar to that of conventional IR techniques. The use of T1 mapping to derive synthetic LGE images may reduce imaging times and operator dependence in future T1 mapping protocols with full left ventricular coverage.q RSNA, 2015
• Threshold-based left ventricular segmentation provides time-efficient assessment of left ventricular parameters • The threshold-based method can discriminate between blood and papillary muscles • This method provides improved accuracy compared to aortic flow measurements as a reference.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.