Early and late responses to treatment with either oral (600 mg/day) or intravenous (20 mg/day) (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate; APD) were studied in 142 patients with Paget's disease of bone who had not previously been treated with bisphosphonate. The efficacy of three therapeutic regimens was compared: (a) oral aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate given continuously until six months after the serum alkaline phosphatase activity had returned to normal (long term); (b) oral aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate given until urinary hydroxyproline excretion had returned to normal (short term); (c) intravenous aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate for 10 days. With either oral or intravenous treatment the decrease in urinary hydroxyproline excretion was rapid and always preceded the fall in serum alkaline phosphatase activity. Normal urinary hydroxyproline excretion is essential for return of the serum alkaline phosphatase activity to normal. Complete biochemical remission, defined as return of the serum alkaline phosphatase activity to normal, was obtained in 129 patients (91%). The

This article reviews the labelling of peptides that are recognised to be of interest for nuclear medicine or are the subject of ongoing nuclear medicine research. Applications and approaches to the labelling of peptide radiopharmaceuticals are discussed, and drawbacks in their development considered.

Aims Intravenous formulations of busulfan have recently become available. Although busulfan is used frequently in children as part of a myeloablative regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation, pharmacokinetic data on intravenous busulfan in children are scarce. The aim was to investigate intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children and to suggest a limited sampling strategy in order to determine busulfan systemic exposure with the minimum of inconvenience and risk for the patient. Methods Plasma pharmacokinetics after the first administration was investigated in six children using nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Results Pharmacokinetics showed little variability and were described adequately with a one-compartment model (population estimates CL,av=0.29 l h x1 kg x1 ;V,av=0.84 l kg x1; t 1/2 =1.7-2.8 h). Combined with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure, the model can adequately estimate the systemic exposure to intravenous busulfan, which in children appears to be at the lower end of the adult range. Conclusions Busulfan systemic exposure in children during intravenous administration can be estimated adequately with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure from a one-compartment model. Intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children should be the subject of more research.

A population two-compartment model is presented to reliably estimate the CsA AUC in KTA and SPKT recipients. The performance of the model to estimate the AUC is comparable to the performance of two published LSMs in KTA patients, but markedly better in SPKT patients. Combined with Bayesian fitting, the model is very flexible since sampling times are not rigid and can be varied as long as dosing and sampling times are recorded accurately. The model has already proven to be clinically useful and is currently used to further investigate CsA in an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

No abstract