A new system of operative fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures is presented: the 'fixateur interne' (F.I.). From a posterior approach long Schanz screws are inserted through the pedicles into the body of the two vertebrae just adjacent to the lesion and connected by th threaded F.I. rods. By tightening the nuts the Schanz screws are fixed in all directions. The advantages of the F.I. system are: excellent reposition by the long lever-arm of the Schanz screws, immobilization of only two segments and therefore good mobility of the residual spine, stability against flexion forces better than is obtained with Harrington distraction rods, additional rotational stability, and fixation in lordosis or kyphosis as is desired. The F.I. does not act as a four point bending system like all other dorsal spine instrumentation systems, but provides stability in flexion by itself. Therefore it can be Used independently of the condition of all ligaments (including the anterior longitudinal ligament) and of the posterior wall of the fractured vertebrae, and there is no need to fix more than the two immediately adjacent vertebrae, thus avoiding the often painful and cumbersome iatrogenic loss of lumbar lordosis and of mobility and permitting early mobilization of the patient. Experience with the first 45 patients is very promising.

Transarticular C1/2 screws are widely used in posterior cervical spine instrumentation. The use of pedicle screws in the cervical spine remains uncommon. Due to superior biomechanical stability compared to lateral mass screws, pedicle screws can be used, especially for patients with poor bone quality or defects in the anterior column. Nevertheless there are potential risks of iatrogenic damage to the spinal cord, nerve roots or the vertebral artery associated with both posterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether C1/2 transarticular screws as well as transpedicular screws in C3 and C4 can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a computer-assisted surgery (CAS) system. We used 13 human cadaver C0-C5 spine segments. We installed 1.4-mm Kirschner wires transarticular in C 1/2, using a specially designed guide, and drilled 2.5-mm pedicle holes in C3 and C4 with the assistance of the CAS system. Hole positions were evaluated by palpation, CT and dissection. Forty-eight (92%) of the 52 drilled pedicles were correctly positioned after palpation, imaging and dissection. The vertebral artery was not injured in any specimen. All of the 26 C1/2 Kirschner wires were placed properly after imaging and dissection evaluations. No injury to vascular or bony structures was observed. C /2 transarticular screws as well as transpedicular screws in the cervical spine can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a CAS system in vitro. Therefore, this technique may be used in a clinical setting, as it offers improved accuracy and reduced radiation dose for the patient and the medical staff. Nevertheless, users should take note of known sources of possible faults causing inaccuracies in order to prevent iatrogenic damage. Small pedicles, with a diameter of less than 4.0 mm, may not be suitable for pedicle screws.

No abstract

IntroductionThe discoligamentous structures of the cervical spine are often involved in cervical spine injuries, for example in whiplash injuries. Although standard clinical imaging techniques, especially nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allow the detection of discoligamentous injuries [9,13,24,30,31], few biomechanical data exist concerning the significance of the different discoligamentous structures for the load-displacement properties of the cervical spine under physiological loads. Several studies have been carried out to evaluate the load-displacement properties of the normal lower cervical spine in vitro [6,15,17,19,25] and in vivo [2,3,12,20], as well as in different types of artificial defect situations [6,18,26,32]. Variations in the study designs with regard to testing protocol and type of artificial defect make comparison between the different studies difficult. Few studies have tested artificial discoligamentous defects in the lower cervical spine under near-physiological loads [25,26,32].The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the type and amount of instability caused by injury of different discoligamentous structures of the cervical spine in comparison to the intact cervical spine.Abstract The objective of this study was to determine which discoligamentous structures of the lower cervical spine provide significant stability with regard to different loading conditions. Accordingly, the loaddisplacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine were tested in vitro. Four artificially created stages of increasing discoligamentous instability of the segment C5/6 were compared to the normal C5/6 segment. Six fresh human cadaver spine segments C4-C7 were tested in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending using pure moments of ± 2.5 Nm without axial preload. Five conditions were investigated consecutively: (1) the intact functional spinal unit (FSU) C5/6; (2) the FSU C5/6 with the anterior longitudinal ligament and the intertransverse ligaments sectioned; (3) the FSU C5/6 with an additional 10-mm-deep incision of the anterior half of the anulus fibrosus and the disc; (4) the FSU C5/6 with additionally sectioned ligamenta flava as well as interspinous and supraspinous ligaments; (5) the FSU C5/6 with additional capsulotomy of the facet joints. In flexion/extension, significant differences were observed concerning range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) for all four stages of instability compared to the intact FSU. In axial rotation, only the stage 4 instability showed a significantly increased ROM and NZ compared to the intact FSU. For lateral bending, no significant differences were observed. Based on these data, we conclude that flexion/extension is the most sensitive load-direction for the tested discoligamentous instabilities.

No abstract