Introduction:The consumption of processed food is increasing in developing countries. Nutrition labels on food packaging are important for the education of consumers, particularly adolescents, to help them make healthier food choices. However, there is evidence to suggest that adolescents generally do not use nutrition labels. This study aims to explore the personal factors that influence the practice of Malaysian adolescents in reading nutrition labels. Methods: The participants were adolescents, aged 13-16 years, from five public schools in Negeri Sembilan. Five semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. The participants discussed their personal views, knowledge and perceptions regarding the use of nutrition labels and food selection. Data gathered from the FGDs were coded through thematic analysis using the NVivo software. Results: While the participants were familiar with nutrition labels, their usage was relatively low during food selection due to the lack of interest in nutrition information, past experiences, hunger and cravings, time constraints and the taste of the food. The main reasons for using nutrition labels were health consciousness and their curiosity about specific nutrition information provided on the labels. The majority of participants believed that information provided on the labels was accurate because it was provided by reliable institutions. There was also misperception among some participants, mixing up nutrition labels with list of ingredients and the expiry dates. A few participants were unconvinced by the labels and stated that the labels provided misleading information. Conclusion: Personal factors such as knowledge, misperception, awareness and trust significantly impact how adolescents read nutrition labels.
Qualitative research methods are receiving increasing recognition in healthcare-related studies. Nonetheless, the debate among scholars continues regarding validity in qualitative research; that is, whether the tools, processes, and data used are appropriate. Therefore, this study aims to describe the development and content validation of a focus group discussion (FGD) interview guide, which was utilized to explore practices and factors that influence adolescents’ usage of the Nutrition Information Panel (NIP) for food choices. A methodological study was carried out to assess the content validity of the FGD interview guide through a two-stage process (i.e., development and validation). The FGD interview guide for this study was developed by the researchers following five essential steps: identification of research objectives, selection of topics and questions, development of the guide, expert evaluations, and a pilot test. The developed FGD guide was assessed by five content experts representing a range of disciplines, including nutritionists, academicians, a qualitative researcher, and a teacher. A pilot FGD was conducted using a setting and participant criteria similar to those that will be employed in the main study. The content validity index (CVI) value for the developed FGD guide is 0.938. Seven out of 13 questions were modified based on the experts’ recommendations, such as reviewing an item, splitting it into two if necessary, retaining its original syntax if it was already suitable, or adding some new items. Subsequently, the researchers refined the questions’ wording and structure based on the analysis from the pilot FGD. Probes were also added to several questions to elicit in-depth responses from the participants. The final version of the FGD guide consisted of 13 main items and probes. The content validity of the FGD interview guide used in the pilot study was affirmed by a panel of experts; hence, it was deemed to be a valid instrument for measuring adolescents’ use of the NIP in future studies. Further investigation is needed to improve assessments of procedural knowledge and to test the interview guide in other populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.