Silicosis is a fibrotic disease caused by the inhalation of respirable silica particles, which are typically engulfed by alveolar macrophages and subsequently induce the release of inflammatory cytokines. Various animal experimental and human studies have focused on modeling silicosis, to assess the interactions of macrophages and other cell types with silica particles. There is still, however, limited knowledge on the differential response upon silica-exposure between silicosis patients and controls. We focused on studying the responsiveness of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) - Ludox and NM-200 - of silicosis patients and controls. The proliferative capacity of T- CD3+ and B- CD19+ cells, were evaluated via Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) assay. The activation status of lymphocyte subsets and response to silica were also evaluated by comparing the extent of micro-granuloma or aggregate formation with the cytokine secretion profiles between both groups of individuals. The proliferative capacity of CD19+ cells was elevated in silicotic patients as opposed to controls. Subsets of regulatory T cells (CD4+ CD25+ and CD8+ CD25+) and immunoglobulins IgM and IgG were also significantly increased in patients. The number and the size of aggregates formed were higher with SiNPs stimulation in patients compared to controls. Multivariable analysis also elucidated the role of key cytokines like interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), which were upregulated in SiNP-stimulated PBMCs of patients compared to controls. Our ex vivo model thus has potential to provide insights into the immunological effects of silica particles in lymphocytes of silicosis patients and controls.

The process of granuloma formation is complex, and due to species differences, the validity of animal studies is somewhat questioned. Moreover, the large number of animals needed to observe the different stages of development also raises ethical questions. Therefore, researchers have explored the use of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), a heterogeneous population of immune cells, in an in vitro model. This review included in vitro studies that focused on exposing PBMCs—from healthy, sensitized, or diseased individuals—to antigens derived from infectious agents—such as mycobacteria or Schistosoma spp.—or inorganic antigens—such as beryllium. The reviewed studies mainly explored how human in vitro granuloma models can contribute towards understanding the pathogenesis of granulomatous diseases, especially during the early stages of granuloma formation. The feasibility of granuloma modelling was thus largely assessed via experimental techniques including (1) granuloma scoring indices (GI), (2) cell surface markers and (3) cytokine secretion profiling. While granuloma scoring showed some similarities between studies, a large variability of culture conditions and endpoints measured have been identified. The lack of any standardization currently impedes the success of a human in vitro granuloma model.

The ability to monitor lymphocyte responses is critical for developing our understanding of the immune response in humans. In the current clinical setting, relying on the metabolic incorporation of [3H] thymidine into cellular DNA via a lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) is the only method that is routinely performed to determine cell proliferation. However, techniques that measure DNA synthesis with a radioactive material such as [3H] thymidine are intrinsically more sensitive to the different stages of the cell cycle, which could lead to over-analyses and the subsequent inaccurate interpretation of the information provided. With cell proliferation assays, the output should preferably provide a direct and accurate measurement of the number of actively dividing cells, regardless of the stimuli properties or length of exposure. In fact, an ideal technique should have the capacity to measure lymphocyte responses on both a quantitative level, i.e., cumulative magnitude of lymphoproliferative response, and a qualitative level, i.e., phenotypical and functional characterization of stimulated immune cells. There are many LPT alternatives currently available to measure various aspects of cell proliferation. Of the nine techniques discussed, we noted that the majority of these LPT alternatives measure lymphocyte proliferation using flow cytometry. Across some of these alternatives, the covalent labelling of cells with a high fluorescence intensity and low variance with minimal cell toxicity while maximizing the number of detectable cell divisions or magnitude of proliferation was achieved. Herein, we review the performance of these different LPT alternatives and address their compatibility with the [3H] thymidine LPT so as to identify the “best” alternative to the [3H] thymidine LPT.

No abstract

No abstract