No abstract

TAP block plus local wound infiltration in the setting of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program guarantees a reduced use of opioid analgesics and good pain control allowing the improvement of essential items of enhanced recovery pathways.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 2 different analgesic approaches on pain, postoperative rehabilitation exercises and rescue analgesics of 2 groups of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major lung resection for cancer. METHODS A total of 94 patients undergoing a VATS major lung resection were randomly allocated to 2 groups: the control group received intravenous and oral (i.e. systemic) analgesics while the intervention group received systemic analgesics plus pre-emptive serratus plane block. Pain perception was recorded until drainage removal or until 2 p.m. of postoperative day (POD) 3. In particular, the primary end point was defined as the peak pain perception on POD 1 (in the time frame between 6 a.m. and 2 p.m.). Secondary end points were the number of forced inspiration manoeuvers during rehabilitative incentive spirometry on POD 1 and 2 and the overall number of rescue analgesics requested by patients. RESULTS Serratus plane block provided a better pain control between 6 a.m. and 2 p.m. of POD 1 (Numeric Rating Scale 1.7 vs 3.5; P < 0.001). Patients in the intervention group performed more forced inspiration manoeuvers at a mean higher volume during incentive spirometry (8.9 vs 7, P < 0.001, and 1010 vs 865 ml, P = 0.02). They required fewer rescue doses of analgesics (0.57 vs 1.1; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Serratus plane block provided a better pain control, entailing a better performance during postoperative rehabilitation exercises in terms of duration and quality of incentive spirometry. It diminished the patient’s need for rescue analgesics during the early postoperative period. Clinical trial registration number NCT03134729.

Objective: Different fast track programs for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) can be found in the current literature. The aim of this work was to develop a new enhanced recovery protocol (ERP). Patients and Methods: The ERP was designed after a structured literature review focusing on reduced bowel preparation, standardized feeding, postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain control. In order to test the ERP, a pilot observational prospective cohort study was planned, enrolling all patients consecutively undergoing RC and Vescica Ileale Padovana (VIP) neobladder. These patients were compared with a matched group of subjects who had undergone RC and VIP neobladder before implementation of the ERP. To achieve good comparability, a propensity score-matching was performed. The primary aim was to assess the ERP's feasibility; the secondary outcome measures were early morbidity and mortality. Results and Limitations: After an exhaustive literature search and a multidisciplinary consultation, an ERP was designed. Nine consecutive patients participated in the pilot study and were compared to 13 patients treated before implementation of the ERP. We did not find any statistically significant difference in terms of mortality rate (none died peri- or postoperatively in both groups). The complication rate, according to the modified Clavien classification, was significantly lower in the ERP group (22.22 vs. 84.61%, p < 0.004). The major limitations are the low number of patients enrolled to test the protocol and the lack of randomization for the comparative evaluations. Conclusion: The introduction of our ERP was proven to be feasible in the management of patients undergoing RC and intestinal urinary diversion with VIP neobladder. The postoperative course was enhanced by a significant reduction in both nasogastric tube insertion and parenteral nutrition support, with early postoperative feeding. All these findings were associated with no deleterious effect on morbidity or mortality, indeed there was a reduced occurrence of postoperative complication rates.