The phrase "Networks of Care" seems familiar but remains poorly defined. A health system that exemplifies effective Networks of Care (NOC) purposefully and effectively interconnects service delivery touch points within a catchment area to fill critical service gaps and create continuity in patient care. To more fully elaborate the concept of Networks of Care, we conducted a multimethod scoping study that included a literature review, stakeholder interviews, and descriptive case studies from five low-and middle-income countries. Our extended definition of a Network of Care features four overlapping and interdependent domains of activity at multiple levels of health systems, characterized by: 1) Agreement and Enabling Environment, 2) Operational Standards, 3) Quality, Efficiency and Responsibility, and 4) Learning and Adaptation. There are a series of key interrelated themes within each domain. Creating a common understanding of what characterizes and fosters an effective Network of Care can drive the evolution and strengthening of national health programs, especially those incorporating universal health coverage and promoting comprehensive care and integrated services. An understanding of the Networks of Care model can help guide efforts to move health service delivery toward goals that can benefit a diversity of stakeholders, including a variety of health system actors, such as health care workers, users of health systems, and the wider community at large. It can also contribute to improving poor health outcomes and reducing waste originating from fragmented services and lack of access.

High-performing primary health care (PHC) is essential for achieving universal health coverage. However, in many countries, PHC is weak and unable to deliver on its potential. Improvement is often limited by a lack of actionable data to inform policies and set priorities. To address this gap, the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) was formed to strengthen measurement of PHC in low-income and middle-income countries in order to accelerate improvement. PHCPI’s Vital Signs Profile was designed to provide a comprehensive snapshot of the performance of a country’s PHC system, yet quantitative information about PHC systems’ capacity to deliver high-quality, effective care was limited by the scarcity of existing data sources and metrics. To systematically measure the capacity of PHC systems, PHCPI developed the PHC Progression Model, a rubric-based mixed-methods assessment tool. The PHC Progression Model is completed through a participatory process by in-country teams and subsequently reviewed by PHCPI to validate results and ensure consistency across countries. In 2018, PHCPI partnered with five countries to pilot the tool and found that it was feasible to implement with fidelity, produced valid results, and was highly acceptable and useful to stakeholders. Pilot results showed that both the participatory assessment process and resulting findings yielded novel and actionable insights into PHC strengths and weaknesses. Based on these positive early results, PHCPI will support expansion of the PHC Progression Model to additional countries to systematically and comprehensively measure PHC system capacity in order to identify and prioritise targeted improvement efforts.

No abstract

Our research explores an understudied element of how clinics can implement improvement despite barriers: integrating stakeholders within and outside the clinic into the process. It provides clinic managers with an actionable path for implementing improvement.