A general tritrophic model of intermediate complexity representing the dynamics of trophic level biomass and numbers is presented. The rudiments of the behavior and physiology of resource acquisition and conversion are incorporated as functional and numerical response models. The tritrophic model is used to examine the effects of trophic position on bottom—up—top—down regulation of populations in theory and in practice. The zero growth isoclines of the interacting populations are used to examine the dynamics of the tritrophic system. The herbivore (M2) and predator (M3) but not the plant (M1) isoclines can be solved explicitly. The plant and herbivore isoclines have two forms that depend on whether the proportion of the trophic level available to its consumer (i.e., its apparency) is greater than or less than its potential per unit biomass population growth rate. Rough estimates of the parameters of these inequalities may be deduced from our knowledge of the search biology of the species and known size to growth rate relationships. The model shows clearly that bottom—up regulation sets the upper limit for trophic—level growth and top—down regulation determines the level of realized growth. The model explains the paradoxes of enrichment and of biological control that arise from the standard Lotka—Volterra models, and its qualitative predictions compare well to the general conclusions of intensive studies on biological control of the cassava mealybug on cassava by an exotic parasitoid. However, discrepancies that were found caution against unconsidered extrapolation of theoretical predictions to specific situations. The model qualitatively defines the dynamics required of a successful weed biological control agent, of a stable fresh water algal—arthropod herbivore—vertebrate predator system, and of a marine phytoplankton—krill—whale system. The utility of the model is its generality and its basis in quantifiable biology.
Over the past several decades biologists' fascination with plant-herbivore interactions has generated intensive research into the implications of these interactions for insect diversification. The study of closely related phytophagous insect species or populations from an evolutionary perspective can help illuminate ecological and selective forces that drive these interactions. Here we present such an analysis for aphids in the genus Hyalopterus (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a cosmopolitan group that feeds on plants in the genus Prunus (Rosaceae). Hyalopterus currently contains two recognized species associated with different Prunus species, although the taxonomy and evolutionary history of the group is poorly understood. Using mitochondrial COI sequences, 16S rDNA sequences from the aphid endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola, and nine microsatellite loci we investigated population structure in Hyalopterus from the most commonly used Prunus host species throughout the Mediterranean as well as in California, where the species H. pruni is an invasive pest. We found three deeply divergent lineages structured in large part by specific associations with plum, almond, and peach trees. There was no evidence that geographic or temporal barriers could explain the overall diversity in the genus. Levels of genetic differentiation are consistent with that typically attributed to aphid species and indicate divergence times older than the domestication of Prunus for agriculture. Interestingly, in addition to their typical hosts, aphids from each of the three lineages were frequently found on apricot trees. Apricot also appears to act as a resource mediated hybrid zone for plum and almond associated lineages. Together, results suggest that host plants have played a role in maintaining host-associated differentiation in Hyalopterus for as long as several million years, despite worldwide movement of host plants and the potential for ongoing hybridization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.