Opioid analgesics are amongst the most commonly administered drugs in hospitals. Whether natural or synthetic, they show some common structural features, morphine-like pharmacological action and binding specificity for complementary opioid receptors. Tramadol differs from the other opioid analgesics in possessing monoaminergic activity in addition to its affinity for the μ opioid receptor. Many opioids are potent histamine releasers producing a variety of haemodynamic changes and anaphylactoid reactions, but the relationship of the appearance of these effects to the histamine plasma concentration is complex and there is no direct and invariable relationship between the two. Studies of the histamine-releasing effects, chiefly centred on morphine, reveal variable findings and conclusions often due to a range of factors including differences in technical measurements, dose, mode of administration, site of injection, the anatomical distribution of histamine receptors and heterogeneity of patient responses. Morphine itself has multiple direct effects on the vasculature and other haemodynamically-active mediators released along with histamine contribute to the variable responses to opioid drug administration. Despite their heavy use and occasional apparent anaphylactic-like side-effects, immunoglobulin E antibodymediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions to the drugs are not often encountered. uncertainties associated with skin testing with these known histamine-releasers, and the general unavailability of opioid drug-specific immunoglobulin E antibody tests contribute to the frequent failure to adequately investigate and establish underlying mechanisms of reactions by distinguishing anaphylactoid from true anaphylactic reactions. Clinical implications for diagnosis of reactions and some speculations on the rarity of true Type 1 allergies to these drugs are presented.

Following the demonstration 25 years ago that substituted ammonium groups on neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) are the main allergenic structures recognized by IgE antibodies in the sera of some patients who experience anaphylaxis during anaesthesia, immunoassays for these drugs were quickly applied to supplement skin tests in the diagnostic assessment of suspected adverse reactions to anaesthetic agents. Many subjects who react to an NMBD do so on first exposure and this led to the speculation that the origin of allergic sensitization is an environmental agent(s) or another drug containing an ammonium ion. Direct antibody binding and hapten inhibition studies revealed that morphine, which contains a tertiary amino group, was strongly recognized by IgE in sera from anaphylactic patients and a morphine-solid phase immunoassay was found to be superior to NMBD-based assays for the detection of NMBD-reactive IgE antibodies. Extensive inhibition experiments indicate the likelihood of antibody combining site heterogeneity with recognition at the fine structural level of features additional, and adjacent to, ammonium ions. Further quantitative investigations are needed to identify these neighbouring groups on different NMBDs. Recent work has implicated the morphine analogue pholcodine as the sensitizing agent in Norway where, unlike Sweden, anaphylactic reactions to NMBDs are not uncommon and the medicament is available over-the-counter. This has led to the suggestion that allergenic sensitization to the ammonium group of pholcodine may account for the different incidences of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia in the two countries. This work is subjected to critical review and some alternative speculations on the nature and origin of the sensitizing agent(s) are presented.

As a result of recent research and development, an expanding range of in vitro assays for the detection of drug-reactive IgE antibodies is now available for the diagnosis of individual drug allergies. Continuing immunochemical studies on drugs implicated in allergic reactions via further development of specific immunoassays and production of drug-protein conjugates will allow us to build up a picture of the repertoire of drug and drug-derived B-cell allergenic determinant structures and to identify and predict cross-reactivities. Although we have made good progress in identifying some drug B-cell determinants, we remain ignorant of drug T-cell determinants and, indeed, of the nature of T-cell recognition of all nonpeptide molecules. Demonstration that drugs specifically recognize T-cells from drug-allergic patients may reveal associations with HLA phenotypes, the nature and location of interaction between drug and MHC molecules, and the nature and identity of drug or drug-derived T-cell antigens. A knowledge of the molecular nature of T-cell determinants inducing allergic responses is fundamental to therapeutic attempts to modulate these deleterious reactions. The possibility now exists for the allergenic screening of drugs as part of their toxicological evaluation, and identification of allergenic structures on drugs also has implications for the testing of allergenic activity and sensitizing potential of other chemicals in our environment. Obvious and important areas for the application of our methods and findings are the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.

No abstract

Of the very large number and variety of drugs used in medicine, those that are frequently implicated in immediate allergic reactions are relatively small in number and include neuromuscular blocking drugs used in anaesthesia, beta-lactam antibiotics, some other antibacterial agents including broad-spectrum antibiotics and quinolones and, less often, some narcotics. Structure-activity and immunochemical investigations have been most numerous and detailed for neuromuscular blocking drugs and beta-lactams, particularly penicillins. For the former group of drugs, morphine is proving to be a useful agent for the in-vitro detection of clinically relevant neuromuscular blocking drug-- as well as morphine- and fentanyl-reactive IgE antibodies. The employment of so-called 'major' and 'minor' determinants for a range of different penicillins and cephalosporins has revealed previously unsuspected heterogeneity in patient recognition responses, and has reinforced findings on the allergenic importance of side-chain groups. Many reports have been published on anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine, and progress in identifying allergenic determinants is reviewed together with the still inadequately understood subject of IgE antibody recognition of quinolone antibacterial agents.