No abstract

No abstract

The performance of control charts can be adversely affected when based on parameter estimates instead of known in‐control parameters. Several studies have shown that a large number of phase I observations may be needed to achieve the desired in‐control statistical performance. However, practitioners use different phase I samples and thus different parameter estimates to construct their control limits. As a consequence, there would be in‐control average run length (ARL) variation between different practitioners. This kind of variation is important to consider when studying the performance of control charts with estimated parameters. Most of the previous literature has relied primarily on the expected value of the ARL (AARL) metric in studying the performance of control charts with estimated parameters. Some recent studies, however, considered the standard deviation of the ARL metric to study the performance of control charts. In this paper, the standard deviation of the ARL metric is used to study the in‐control and out‐of‐control performance of the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average (AEWMA) control chart. The performance of the AEWMA chart is then compared with that of the Shewhart trueX¯ and EWMA control charts. The simulation results show that the AEWMA chart might represent a good solution for practitioners to achieve a reasonable amount of ARL variation from the desired in‐control ARL performance. In addition, we apply a bootstrap‐based design approach that provides protection against frequent false alarms without deteriorating too much the out‐of‐control performance. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The adaptive exponentially weighted moving average (AEWMA) control chart has the advantage of detecting balance mixed range of mean shifts. Its performance has been studied under the assumption that the process parameters are known. Under this assumption, previous studies have shown AEWMA to provide superior statistical performance when compared with other different types of control charts. In practice, however, the process parameters are usually unknown and are required to be estimated. Using a Markov Chain approach, we show that the performance of the AEWMA control chart is affected when parameters are estimated compared with the known-parameter case. In addition, we show the effect of different standard deviation estimators on the chart performance. Finally, a performance comparison is conducted between the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart and the AEWMA chart when the process parameters are unknown. We recommend the use of the AEWMA chart over the ordinary EWMA chart especially when a small number of Phase I samples is available to estimate the unknown parameters.

No abstract