The popping of amarunth grain (Amaranthus caudatus var INIAP-Alegrõ Âa) by hot air processing was studied. A household corn popper adapted to control heating and air¯ow was used. The effects of temperature, load, air¯ow and moisture on the popping capacity and on the functional properties, nutritional quality, crude protein content, lysine content and sensory texture of the poppei grain were investigate. The yield, expansion volume and density of popped grain showed that the optimal conditions for the popping process were 240°C, 22 g load, 0.013 m 3 s À1 air¯ow and 12% grain moisture. The proportion of popped grain with butter¯y shape was highest (p < 0.05) at 220°C, 22 g load, 0.014 m 3 s À1 air¯ow and 14% grain moisture. The functional and physic-chemical properties of popped grain obtained by various treatments showed completely gelatinised starch. The total, available and resistant starch contents were similar among the different treatments. The enzymatic degradation of starch was 65% within 5±15 min of incubation with a-amylase. The crude protein content was almost 15% for all the treatments, while the total lysine content was 45.2±48.0 mg g À1 protein.The in vitro availability of protein of popped grain obtained at 0.013 m 3 s À1 air¯ow and 14% grain moisture was above 84%. The highest available lysine value was found for popped grain obtained at 0.014 m 3 s À1 air¯ow, 18±22 g load and 12±14% grain moisture. However, six of the eight treatments had available lysine contents that varied between 41.2 and 47.4 mg g À1 protein. Sensory analyses showed that the treatments with the highest popping capacity produced grains with high crunch and expansion capacities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.