No abstract

Viral myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium secondary to viral infection. The clinical presentation of viral myocarditis is very heterogeneous and can range from nonspecific symptoms of malaise and fatigue in subclinical disease to a more florid presentation, such as acute cardiogenic shock and sudden cardiac death in severe cases. The accurate and prompt diagnosis of viral myocarditis is very challenging. Endomyocardial biopsy is considered to be the gold standard test to confirm viral myocarditis; however, it is an invasive procedure, and the sensitivity is low when myocardial involvement is focal. Cardiac imaging hence plays an essential role in the noninvasive evaluation of viral myocarditis. The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has generated considerable interest in the use of imaging in the early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related myocarditis. This article reviews the role of various cardiac imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and assessment of viral myocarditis, including COVID-19-related myocarditis.

Aim of the study Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy encompasses systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and conduction abnormalities. This study aims to investigate the impact of LVDD on mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Material and methods A retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients who underwent LT at our institution was performed. Patient demographics, clinical data, and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were reviewed to identify LVDD. The total cohort consisted of 266 patients after excluding patients with insufficient TTE data ( n = 56), patients with indeterminate LVDD ( n = 71), and patients with ejection fraction (EF) < 55% ( n = 7). Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Cox regressions with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied to predict 5-year all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to understand the impact of LVDD on 5-year all-cause mortality. Results Patients with LVDD have higher incidence of hyperlipidemia (36% vs. 17%, p = 0.003), hypertension (50% vs. 27%, p = 0.001) and diabetes (52% vs. 30%, p = 0.003). In addition, patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were more likely to have LVDD (48% vs. 24%, p = 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with age, body mass index (BMI), NASH, alcoholic cirrhosis, hepatitis C, history of diabetes, history of hyperlipidemia, and history of hypertension. In this multivariate logistic regression analysis, NASH (odds ratio [OR] = 4.43 [1.10-17.8], p = 0.04), and history of hypertension (OR = 2.33 [1.16-4.66], p = 0.01) were independent predictors of LVDD. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that the presence of LVDD had no impact on 5-year all-cause mortality (log-rank test nonsignificant). Conclusions This study indicates that LVDD in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients does not affect immediate post-transplant outcomes or 5-year all-cause mortality.