Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has made huge progress with respect to innovation, efficacy, and safety, however, complications are still present. Recent studies examined various predictors of complications. However, limited data exist regarding the role of a repeat procedure. Our aim was the prospective evaluation of the incidence and predictors of complications related to AF ablation procedures in consecutive patients, including repeat procedures. Methods and results All ablation procedures for AF between January 2013 and December 2015 were analysed in our electrophysiology laboratory. During the study period 1243 procedures were analysed [394 female, median age 62 (55–69)]. Overall complication rate was 6.84%, major complication rate was 2.82%. Major complications were the following: 18 pericardial tamponades; 5 pseudoaneurysms; 1 arteriovenous fistula; 6 thromboembolic cerebrovascular events; 3 pulmonary vein stenosis; and 2 atrioventricular blocks. No atrio-oesophageal fistula or procedure related death occurred. Univariate analysis for overall complications showed that age ≥ 65 years ( P = 0.0231), female gender ( P = 0.0438), hypertension ( P = 0.0488), CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 2 ( P = 0.0156), and previous AF ablation procedure ( P < 0.0001) is associated with higher risk for adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictor of overall complications was previous AF ablation procedure ( P < 0.0001). Similarly, the only predictor of major complications was previous AF ablation procedure ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion Incidence of complications associated with AF ablation in our high volume electrophysiology laboratory is similar to other cohorts. The only independent predictor of complications was previous AF ablation procedure in our series.

Background - Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation remains high. Recent studies have shown a relation between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and AF. EAT secretes several pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines that directly interact with the adjacent myocardium. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether posterior left atrial (LA) adipose tissue attenuation, as marker of inflammation, is related to AF recurrences after catheter ablation. Methods - Consecutive patients with symptomatic AF referred for first AF catheter ablation who underwent CT were included. The total EAT and posterior LA adipose tissue were manually traced and adipose tissue was automatically recognized as tissue with Hounsfield units (HU) between -195 and -45. The attenuation value of the posterior LA adipose tissue was assessed and the population divided according to the mean HU value (-96.4 HU). Results - In total, 460 patients (66% male, age 61 ± 10 years) were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR 6-32), 168 (37%) patients had AF recurrence. Patients with higher attenuation (≥-96.4 HU) of the posterior LA adipose tissue showed higher AF recurrence rates compared to patients with lower attenuation (<-96.4 HU) (log-rank test p=0.046). Univariate analysis showed an association between AF recurrence and higher posterior LA adipose tissue attenuation (≥-96.4 HU) (p<0.05). On multivariable analysis posterior LA adipose tissue attenuation (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.90-1.76; p=0.181) remained a promising predictor of AF recurrence following catheter ablation. Conclusions - Posterior LA adipose tissue attenuation is a promising predictor of AF recurrence in patients who undergo catheter ablation. Higher adipose tissue attenuation might signal increased local inflammation and serve as an imaging biomarker of increased risk of AF recurrence.

Introduction Our pilot study aimed to evaluate the role of local impedance drop in lesion formation during pulmonary vein isolation with a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter that records local impedance as well and to find a local impedance cut-off value that predicts successful lesion formation. Materials and methods After completing point-by-point radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation, the success of the applications was evaluated by pacing along the ablation line at 10 mA, 2 ms pulse width. Lesions were considered successful if loss of local capture was achieved. Results Out of 645 applications, 561 were successful and 84 were unsuccessful. Compared to the unsuccessful ablation points, the successful applications were shorter (p = 0.0429) and had a larger local impedance drop (p<0.0001). There was no difference between successful and unsuccessful applications in terms of mean contact force (p = 0.8571), force-time integral (p = 0.0699) and contact force range (p = 0.0519). The optimal cut-point for the local impedance drop indicating successful lesion formation was 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall [AUC = 0.80 (0.75–0.86), p<0.0001], and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall [AUC = 0.77 (0.72–0.83), p<0.0001]. A local impedance drop larger than 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall was associated with an increased probability of effective lesion creation [OR = 11.21, 95%CI 4.22–29.81, p<0.0001; and OR = 7.91, 95%CI 3.77–16.57, p<0.0001, respectively]. Conclusion The measurement of the local impedance may predict optimal lesion formation. A local impedance drop > 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and > 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall significantly increases the probability of creating a successful lesion.

IntroductionHigh-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation has been proposed to produce rapid and effective lesions for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to evaluate the procedural characteristics and the first-pass isolation (FPI) rate of HPSD and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation compared to the low-power long-duration (LPLD) ablation technique.MethodsOne hundred fifty-six patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled and assigned to LPLD, HPSD, or vHPSD PVI. The energy setting was 30, 50, and 90 W in the LPLD, HPSD, and vHPSD groups, respectively. In the vHPSD group, 90 W/4 s energy delivery was used in the QMODE+ setting. In the other groups, ablation index-guided applications were delivered with 30 W (LPLD) or 50 W (HPSD).ResultsBilateral PVI was achieved in all cases. Compared to the LPLD group, the HPSD and vHPSD groups had shorter procedure time [85 (75–101) min, 79 (65–91) min, and 70 (53–83) min], left atrial dwelling time [61 (55–70) min, 53 (41–56) min, and 45 (34–52) min], total RF time [1,567 (1,366–1,761) s, 1,398 (1,021–1,711) s, and 336 (247–386) s], but higher bilateral FPI rate (57, 78, and 80%) (all p-values &lt; 0.01). The use of HPSD (OR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023) and vHPSD (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.24–6.44, p = 0.014) ablation techniques were associated with a higher probability of bilateral FPI. The 9-month AF-recurrence rate was lower in case of HPSD and vHPSD compared to LPLD ablation (10, 8, and 36%, p = 0.0001). Moreover, the presence of FPI was associated with a lower AF-recurrence rate at 9-month (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04–0.24, p = 0.0001).ConclusionOur prospective, observational cohort study showed that both HPSD and vHPSD RF ablation shortens procedure and RF time and results in a higher rate of FPI compared to LPLD ablation. Moreover, the use of HPSD and vHPSD ablation increased the acute and mid-term success rate. No safety concerns were raised for HPSD or vHPSD ablation in our study.

BackgroundFluoroscopy has been an essential part of every electrophysiological procedure since its inception. However, till now no clear standards regarding acceptable x‐ray exposure nor recommendation how to achieve them have been proposed.HypothesisCurrent norms and quality markers required for optimal clinical routine can be identified.MethodsCenters participating in this Europe‐wide multicenter, prospective registry were requested to provide characteristics of the center, operators, technical equipment as well as procedural settings of consecutive cases.ResultsTwenty‐five centers (72% university clinics, with a mean volume of 526 ± 348 procedures yearly) from 14 European countries provided data on 1788 cases [9% diagnostic procedures (DP), 38% atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, 44% other supraventricular (SVT) ablations, and 9% ventricular ablations (VT)] conducted by 95 operators (89% male, 41 ± 7 years old).Mean dose area product (DAP) and time was 304 ± 608 cGy*cm2, 3.6 ± 4.8 minutes, 1937 ± 608 cGy*cm2, 15.3 ± 15.5 minutes, 805 ± 1442 cGy*cm2, 10.6 ± 10.7 minutes, and 1277 ± 1931 cGy*cm2, 10.4 ± 12.3 minutes for DP, AF, SVT, and VT ablations, respectively. Seven percent of all procedures were conducted without any use of fluoroscopy.Procedures in the lower quartile of DAP were performed more frequently by female operators (OR 1.707, 95%CI 1.257‐2.318, P = .001), in higher‐volume center (OR 1.001 per one additional procedure, 95%CI 1.000‐1.001, P = .002), with the use of 3D‐mapping system (OR 2.622, 95%CI 2.053‐3.347, P < .001) and monoplane x‐ray system (OR 2.945, 95%CI 2.149‐4.037, P < .001).ConclusionExposure to ionizing radiation varies widely in daily practice for all procedure. Significant opportunities for harmonization of exposure toward the lower range has been identified.