Outlier detection in high-dimensional datasets is a fundamental and challenging problem across disciplines that has also practical implications, as removing outliers from the training set improves the performance of machine learning algorithms. While many outlier mining algorithms have been proposed in the literature, they tend to be valid or efficient for specific types of datasets (time series, images, videos, etc.). Here we propose two methods that can be applied to generic datasets, as long as there is a meaningful measure of distance between pairs of elements of the dataset. Both methods start by defining a graph, where the nodes are the elements of the dataset, and the links have associated weights that are the distances between the nodes. Then, the first method assigns an outlier score based on the percolation (i.e., the fragmentation) of the graph. The second method uses the popular IsoMap non-linear dimensionality reduction algorithm, and assigns an outlier score by comparing the geodesic distances with the distances in the reduced space. We test these algorithms on real and synthetic datasets and show that they either outperform, or perform on par with other popular outlier detection methods. A main advantage of the percolation method is that is parameter free and therefore, it does not require any training; on the other hand, the IsoMap method has two integer number parameters, and when they are appropriately selected, the method performs similar to or better than all the other methods tested.

The study of network robustness focuses on the way the overall functionality of a network is affected as some of its constituent parts fail. Failures can occur at random or be part of an intentional attack and, in general, networks behave differently against different removal strategies. Although much effort has been put on this topic, there is no unified framework to study the problem. Whilst random failures have been mostly studied under percolation theory, targeted attacks have been recently restated in terms of network dismantling. In this work, we link these two approaches by performing a finite-size scaling analysis to four dismantling strategies over Erdös-Rényi networks: initial and recalculated high degree removal (ID and RD) and initial and recalculated high betweenness removal (IB and RB). We find that both degree-based attacks lie into the same universality class, but the betweenness-based attacks differ significantly. In particular, RB produces a very abrupt transition with a hump in the cluster size distribution near the critical point, resembling some explosive percolation processes. *

No abstract