Background In current ESC/EAPC guidelines, adding resistance training to endurance training is advised for patients with heart failure (HF), but the optimal intensity of the resistance training is unknown (40–80% of 1RM is advised). Purpose To investigate the effects of high- vs low-intensity resistance training as an adjunct to endurance training on: aerobic capacity (primary outcome), walking capacity, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with HF. Methods Forty patients with HF were consecutively recruited in the cardiac rehabilitation center of the Hospital East-Limburg in Belgium. Patients were block-randomized (by age and sex) by an independent researcher to receive maximally 45 supervised sessions (3x/week) of high-intense (HI: 3 exercises, 3x12 repetitions, 55–70%1RM) or low-intense resistance training (LI: 3 exercises, 3x22 repetitions, 35–40%1RM) as an adjunct to endurance training (30 min/session; 50–75% VO2max). The aerobic capacity (VO2max) was measured by a blinded assessor with a ramp cardiopulmonary cycling test (+5–30W/min). Walking distance was assessed with a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximal strength with 1RM (leg-press, pull-down and dip), and quality of life with the Minnesota questionnaire. An unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or ANCOVA were used for between-group analysis, and paired t-test or Wilcox sign-rank test for the within-group analysis. Results Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and training adherence (HI vs LI; 20 vs 20 subjects; Age: 62±9 vs 59±13 years; Sex: 76% vs 79%male; BMI: 27±58 vs 29±4 kg/m2; LVEF: 35±10 vs 38±6%; Adherence: 33±10 vs 36±10 sessions; p>0.05). There were no adverse events. Both groups had significant within-group improvements in aerobic and walking capacity (VO2max: LI (n=20) vs HI (n=19), p≤0.010; 6MWT distance: p≤0.007) (Figure 1), but these improvements did not differ between groups (VO2max: p=0.855; 6MWT distance: p=0.854). The LI group improved significantly more in muscle strength than the HI group (dip and leg-press: p<0.001). Although the LI group significantly improved in the quality of life (Minnesota score reduction: p=0.028), the quality of life did not differ between groups (Minnesota score: p=0.756). Conclusions Both low-and high-intense resistance training are similarly beneficial for improving aerobic and walking capacity in patients with HF. Surprisingly, low-intense resistance training seems superior to high-intense training in improving muscle strength. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Hasselt University
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Hasselt University Background Adding resistance training on top of endurance training is recommended in the rehabilitation of patients with heart failure. However, it is unknown which intensity of resistance training should be preferred. Purpose To compare the effects of the addition of high- vs. low-intensity resistance training on top of endurance training in patients with heart failure. Methods Nineteen patients with heart failure were block randomized (by gender and sex) in a combined high-intensity resistance and endurance group (HIG; n=8, age=61±12y, 7 males, LVEF=38±10%) vs. combined low-intensity resistance and endurance group (LIG; n=9, age=68±21y, 8 males, LVEF=38±13%). Patients trained 3x/week for 45 sessions. The resistance exercises were volume-matched between groups and consisted of three sets of leg press, pull down and dip exercises, separated by 30s of rest, done at 55-70% 1RM in HIG vs. 35-40% 1RM in LIG. Both groups did moderate-intense endurance training on a bicycle, cross-trainer, treadmill and arm ergometer for 30 min per training. Maximal oxygen consumption was evaluated with an incremental cardiopulmonary cycling test and muscle strength by 1-RM testing, while quality of life was assessed with the Minnesota questionnaire, and walking distance by a 6-minute walking test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for analyzing differences between groups in all variables and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for evaluating pre-post difference of the entire sample. P values <0,05 (2-tailed) were considered statistically significant. Results Training adherence was similar in both groups (LIG vs HIG: 41±6 vs 37±9 sessions, p=0,370; Table 1). Overall, the intervention improved maximal oxygen consumption, walking capacity and muscle strength (p<0,05), but the between-group changes in maximal oxygen consumption (LIG vs HIG: 3±2 vs 3±4 ml/kg/min, p=0,963), quality of life (LIG vs HIG: -8±23 vs -1±5 points, p=0,931) and muscle strength (LIG vs HIG: Dip 34±34 vs 18±20kg, p=0,481; Leg press, 66±87 vs 47±53kg, p=0,486; Pull down, 9±6 vs 9±7kg, p=0,574) were similar. Conclusion Adding either high- or low-intensity resistance training on top of endurance training seems equally effective for improving aerobic capacity and walking performance in patients with heart failure. The study is ongoing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.