When comparing corner and straight corridor to acute- and obtuse- angled-corridors, effects of later types of corridors on the pedestrian dynamics is rarely studied. Rationally, there will be changes to the pedestrian walking behavior when approaching and walking through angled-corridor due to the turning angle. This could trigger restrictions to the flow of walkers and causing congestion near that turning angle. Hence, this study is purposely to investigate empirically the characteristics of pedestrians when walking through different angled-corridors (60°, 90° and 135°). Controlled experiment of pedestrians walking through built angled- corridors was conducted at the Multipurpose Hall of USM, involving 60 local undergraduate students. Thirty walking tasks were performed by considering different number of pedestrians (NOP: 1, 15, 30, 45 and 60). Video-based tracking of pedestrian’s trajectories walking through angled-corridors was performed and effects on walking characteristics and velocity were discussed. It is found that, pedestrian not necessarily choose the shortest path while walking, but prefer to occupy all space available to suit their own speed and comfort. As the degree of corridor increases, the impacts to pedestrian walking velocity become less. However, in response to the increase in number of pedestrians, the development of changing track can be witnessed.
The effect of acute- and obtuse-angled-corridors on the evacuation behaviour is rarely studied. In the previous work, we have confirmed that corridor with less than 90° turning angle has negative impact to the pedestrians walking behaviour due to the tendency of the pedestrians to slow down their motion when approaching the turning of the corridor. This restrict the flow of walkers during high-density situation and cause congestion near that turning of the corridor. In this contribution, empirical data collected from previous experimental work is utilised to further study the effect of turning angle on the evacuation behaviour. The simulations of walking through angled-corridor were reproduced which reflects evacuation scenarios. Three different types of angled-corridor are taken into consideration (a 60°-, a 90°-, and a 135°-angled-corridors) with different sets of number of pedestrians (NOP: 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100). Three metrics of evacuation behaviour measurement are reported: (1) inflexion points, (2) escape time, and (3) interaction force. Inflexion point is used to evaluate the restriction flow occurred during the evacuation. From the results, the 60° angled-corridor contained the highest number of inflexion points. With the highest number of inflexion points, the escape time for the 60° angled-corridor is 14.8% to 24% longer compared to the other two types of angled-corridors. This shows that this kind of angled-corridor need to be avoided in the future design of walkways. On top of that, the 60° angled-corridor also gives the maximum interaction force with 213.75 N. This reconfirmed that the corridor with less than 90° turning angle is not suitable to be built as a walkway. This work is relevant to be studied due to its immediate applications in assessment of crowd safety for building egress.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.