Objective The Asian American population in the U.S. comprises various, ethnically diverse subgroups. Traditionally, this population has been studied as a single, aggregated group, potentially masking differences in risk among subgroups. Analyses using disaggregated data can help better characterize the health needs of different Asian subpopulations and inform targeted, effective public health interventions. We assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) and their associations with socioeconomic factors among Chinese, Asian Indian, Filipino and Other Asian subjects, compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) subjects in the U.S. Methods : Cross-sectional study using data from 298,286 adults from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) from 2007 to 2018. We utilized chi-squared tests to compare characteristics across subgroups. Weighted proportions and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were utilized to examine the associations between Asian subgroups, self-reported CVD risk factors and self-reported ASCVD, as well as between socioeconomic factors within each Asian subgroup. Results : Asian Indian subjects had the highest prevalence of diabetes (12.5%), while Filipino subjects had the highest prevalence of hyperlipidemia (27.7%), hypertension (29.8%) and obesity (19.8%). Despite this, the prevalence of self-reported ASCVD was lower in all Asian groups compared with NHWs. Chinese subjects had the lowest odds of having each of the CVD risk factors assessed. Conclusion : We found considerable heterogeneity in the distribution of risk factors as well as ASCVD among Asian subgroups in the US. Compared with health system or community-based reports, the prevalence of risk factors and ASCVD may be underestimated in some Asian NHIS subgroups. There is an urgent need for efforts to improve recruitment of Asian participants of heterogeneous socioeconomic backgrounds in national surveys, as well as to perform a thorough assessment of risk factors and disease in this population, not relying solely on self-report.

Background Catheter ablation improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, despite its benefit, women are less likely than men to undergo catheter ablation. Women with AF have been described to have more frequent and severe symptoms with a lower quality of life than men, and it is therefore unclear why women are less likely to undergo catheter ablation. We prospectively characterized gender differences in AF symptoms among men and women undergoing ablation at UNC using questionnaire data. Methods Functional capacity was assessed with the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and quality of life was assessed with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Symptoms of AF score (CCS‐SAF) and the AF Effect on Quality‐of‐Life Questionnaire Tool (AFEQT). Results Among 191 patients in the study, women were less likely to undergo catheter ablation and had higher rates of paroxysmal AF and higher CHADS2‐VASc scores than men. Women had a worse functional capacity with significantly lower DASI scores than men; quality of life was also worse among women, with higher CCS‐SAF scores and lower AFEQT scores than men. After adjustment for AF type, there was a persistent gender difference for functional capacity and symptom measures. Conclusions At the time of catheter ablation, women with AF had a significantly lower functional status with worse symptoms and a lower quality of life than men. The role of this symptom difference on the gender gap in enrollment for catheter ablation is unclear and likely due to multiple patient and provider factors.

Aims. The identification and characterization of sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy (SUDEP) may be improved, helping to optimize prevention and intervention. We set out to assess the frequency and demographic and clinical characteristics of SUDEP cases in a sudden death cohort. Methods. All out-of-hospital deaths were investigated from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015 in Wake County, NC, attended by the Emergency Medical Services. Cases were screened and adjudicated by three physicians to identify sudden death cases from any cause among free-living adults, aged 18-64. In total, 399 sudden death victims were identified during this twoyear period. Seizure history, demographic and clinical characteristics, and healthcare utilization patterns were assessed from death records, emergency response scene reports, and medical records. Sudden death cases with a history of seizures were summarized by an experienced chart abstractor (SC) and adjudicated by an experienced neurologist (OD). We then compared demographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns of neurologist-identified SUDEP cases to other sudden death victims in our population-based registry of sudden death from any cause. Results. SUDEP accounted for 5.3% of sudden deaths. However, seizures or complications of seizures were only considered the primary cause of death on death certificates in 1.5% of sudden deaths. SUDEP cases were more likely to have a history of alcohol abuse. Mental health disorders and a low level of medication compliance and healthcare utilization were common among SUDEP victims. Conclusions. SUDEP accounts for approximately 5.3% of sudden deaths from any cause in individuals aged between 18 and 64. Death certificates underestimate the burden of sudden death in epilepsy, attributing only 1.5% of sudden deaths to seizures or complications of seizures. Accurate documentation of epileptic disorders on death certificates is essential for the surveillance of SUDEP. Further, interventions that promote better use of medical services and patient engagement with healthy living practices may reduce sudden deaths in epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Sudden death is a public health problem with major impact on society. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is believed to underlie 60-80% of these deaths. While deaths from CAD have decreased in the recent decades, sudden death rates remain unacceptably high. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prevalence of CAD and its risk factors among 18-64-year-old adults in a population-based case registry of sudden deaths and compare them to a living population from the same geographical area. DESIGN: From 2013 to 2015, all sudden deaths among 18-64-year-old adults in Wake County, NC, were identified (n = 371). A comparison group was formed by randomly selecting individuals from an electronic health record repository of a major healthcare system in the area (N = 4218). MAIN MEASURES: Prevalence of CAD and its risk factors among cases of sudden death and living population across sex and age groups. Odds of sudden death associated with atherosclerotic risk factors and comorbidities. KEY RESULTS: CAD was present in 14.8% of sudden death cases. Among sudden death victims, most risk factors and comorbidities were more common in the older age group, except for obesity which was more common in younger cases, and diabetes which was equally prevalent in younger and older cases. Compared to living population, sudden death cases had higher prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors across all gender and age groups. Sudden death cases had a numerically higher number of risk factors compared to living population, regardless of age group or presence of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery disease is not common among sudden death cases, but risk factors and comorbidities are prevalent. Our findings support the changing etiology of sudden death. In the absence of clinically diagnosed CAD, use of novel imaging modalities and biomarkers may identify high-risk individuals and lead to prevention of sudden death.

ObjectiveTo determine the association between serum lipid measurements and the occurrence of out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death (OHSUD).Patients and MethodsWe compared 139 OHSUD cases (43 female patients [30.9%]) and 968 controls (539 female patients [55.7%]) from Wake County, North Carolina, from March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2015. Individuals were included if they were aged 18 to 64 years and had lipid measurements in the 5 years before their death (cases) or the most recent health care encounter (controls). Covariates were abstracted from medical records for all subjects, and those with triglyceride (TG) levels greater than 400 mg/dL (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259) were excluded for low-density lipoprotein (LDL)–related analyses.ResultsBy linear regression using age- and sex-adjusted models, cases of OHSUD had lower adjusted mean total cholesterol (170.3±52.2 mg/dL vs 188.9±39.7 mg/dL; P<.001), LDL cholesterol (90.9±39.6 mg/dL vs 109.6±35.2 mg/dL; P<.001), and non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (121.6±49.8 mg/dL vs 134.3±39.6 mg/dL; P<.001) levels and a higher adjusted TG/HDL-C ratio (4.7±7 vs 3±2.7; P<.001) than did controls. By logistic regression using age- and sex-adjusted models, the odds of OHSUD were elevated per unit increase in TG/HDL-C ratio (1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12).ConclusionOut-of-hospital sudden unexpected death cases had more favorable levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL, possibly indicating a lack of association between traditional lipid cardiovascular risk factors and sudden unexpected death. A comparatively elevated TG/HDL-C ratio in cases may corroborate an evolving hypothesis of how vasoactive and prothrombotic remnant-like lipoprotein particles contribute to sudden unexpected death.