Studies on the drivers of household consumer engagement in various food waste reduction strategies have been limited. We thus address this gap by developing a research model that utilises two well-known theories, namely, the Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour (TIB) and the Comprehensive Model of Environmental Psychology (CMEP), to explain food waste reduction behaviour in household consumers. The model hypothesises positive associations between emotional, social, and cognitive factors and food waste reduction behaviour, as conceptualised using the 3Rs (reuse, reduce, and recycle). A total of 515 U.S. household consumers participated in the cross-sectional survey. The results suggest that emotional (anticipated guilt), social (sense of community), and cognitive factors (awareness about consequences and environmental knowledge) were positively associated with food waste reduction behaviour. However, the study results did not support the association between a sense of community and reuse intentions. Moreover, anticipated guilt and awareness of consequences were significant drivers of the reuse and reduce food waste behaviours, respectively. The age of the study participants also had a significant controlling influence on the reduce intentions. The study findings have significant implications for governments, policymakers, marketers, and academics that are interested in developing strategies to mitigate the impact of food waste.

Impulsive buying in online setting has become an epidemic as it represents a noteworthy proportion of online shopping. Impulsive buying behaviors with upcoming avenues for future research are under the constant considerations of academicians and practitioners. Despite abundant research on impulsive buying behavior in online context, research scholars demand for further research and empirical evidences for better understanding of the phenomenon. It is therefore worthy question to examine impulsive buying behaviors in online setting. This study seeks to model and empirically examine cognitive aspects as a precursor of emotional aspects that ultimately lead towards impulsive buying actions. This study used cognitive emotion theory and emotion-action tendency to model impulsive buying behavior in online context. Specifically, this study seeks to examine key cognitive aspect (ease of use, informativeness, perceived risk and perceived trust) and emotional aspects (pleasantness and arousal) on impulsive buying actions (web browsing and urge to buy impulsively). A total of 317 survey responses from shoppers of online stores were collected with the help of convenience sampling technique. To empirically test the measurements and propositions, structural equation modelling approach was used. From the results a significant model was emerged. In general results were in support of the assertions that cognitive aspects lead toward emotional aspects that resulted in impulsive actions. This study contributes to the literature of decision making, online retailing and e-commerce marketing. This study offers valuable insight and solid grounds to academicians as well as practitioners concerning online impulsive buying behavior by presenting empirical findings and important implications.

This study investigates consumer repurchase behavior and purchases regret in the context of a Steadily Increasing Discount (SID) strategy. A quantitative research approach based on a full‐scaled administrative survey is adopted in the framework of the regret theory. Mall intercept technique is used to collect the cross‐sectional data from respondents. To establish the proposed relational paths, structural equation modeling is applied. The findings of the study suggest that confirmation, price consciousness, and alternative attractiveness have a substantially negative impact on repurchase intention whereas the positive impact on purchase regret is also evident. Furthermore, purchase regret harms repurchase intentions. Moreover, the findings have robust policy implications in the context of corporations offering SID after the economic crisis in developing countries.

The sustainability of food waste is one of the most important contemporary economic, social, and environmental issues that encompasses useful academic, practical, and policymaking implications. Under the domain of sustainability, food waste is a serious global challenge with a growing public, political, and corporate concern. Existing literature regarding the sensitization of consumers and the promotion of waste cautious behaviors still has much room for improvement in household waste. To bridge the gap in the literature, this study identifies and examines determinants of young consumers’ food waste reduction behavior in households. Using a sample size of 391 young consumers of household food products from Pakistan, a full-scaled administrative survey is conducted, and our hypotheses are empirically tested by using the PLS structural modeling equation. Our findings reveal significant impacts from both cognitive and emotional aspects on sustainable food waste reduction behavior. Our results have several important implications for policymakers and all the stakeholders, especially for marketers, including advertising strategies, policies to mitigate the impact of food waste, and the development of educational programs related to food waste.

Previous studies have recognized that the presence of academic directors on the board leads to better corporate governance and accounting quality. However, studies have yet to establish the effectiveness of academic directors in mitigating corporate expropriation in emerging markets. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of academic directors on corporate expropriation in Chinese listed firms. It is observed that the presence of the academic director in the board mitigates earnings management and abnormal investments and enhances the dividend payments. Additionally, we find that the critical mass of academic directors curbs the expropriator managerial behavior in Chinese listed firms.