PurposeIntegrating genomic sequencing in clinical care requires standardization of variant interpretation practices. The Clinical Genome Resource has established expert panels to adapt the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology classification framework for specific genes and diseases. The Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel selected MYH7, a key contributor to inherited cardiomyopathies, as a pilot gene to develop a broadly applicable approach.MethodsExpert revisions were tested with 60 variants using a structured double review by pairs of clinical and diagnostic laboratory experts. Final consensus rules were established via iterative discussions.ResultsAdjustments represented disease-/gene-informed specifications (12) or strength adjustments of existing rules (5). Nine rules were deemed not applicable. Key specifications included quantitative frameworks for minor allele frequency thresholds, the use of segregation data, and a semiquantitative approach to counting multiple independent variant occurrences where fully controlled case-control studies are lacking. Initial inter-expert classification concordance was 93%. Internal data from participating diagnostic laboratories changed the classification of 20% of the variants (n = 12), highlighting the critical importance of data sharing.ConclusionThese adapted rules provide increased specificity for use in MYH7-associated disorders in combination with expert review and clinical judgment and serve as a stepping stone for genes and disorders with similar genetic and clinical characteristics.

Purpose Standardized and accurate variant assessment is essential for effective medical care. To that end, Clinical Genome (ClinGen) Resource clinical domain working groups (CDWG) are systematically reviewing disease-associated genes for sufficient evidence to support disease causality and creating disease-specific specifications of ACMG-AMP guidelines for consistent and accurate variant classification. Methods The ClinGen RASopathy CDWG established an expert panel (EP) to curate gene information and generate gene and disease-specific specifications to ACMG-AMP variant classification framework. These specifications were tested by classifying 37 exemplar pathogenic variants plus an additional 66 variants in ClinVar distributed across nine RASopathy genes. Results RASopathy-related specifications were applied to sixteen ACMG-AMP criteria, with five also having adjustable strength with availability of additional evidence. Another five criteria were deemed not applicable. Key adjustments to minor allele frequency thresholds, multiple de novo occurrence events and/or segregation, and strength adjustments impacted 60% of variant classifications. Unpublished case-level data from participating laboratories impacted 45% of classifications supporting the need for data sharing. Conclusions RAS-specific ACMG-AMP specifications optimized the utility of available clinical evidence and Ras/MAPK pathway-specific characteristics to consistently classify RASopathy-associated variants. These specifications highlight how grouping genes by shared features promotes rapid multi-genic variant assessment without sacrificing specificity and accuracy.

The RASopathies are a complex group of conditions regarding phenotype and genetic etiology. The ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (RAS EP) assessed published and other publicly available evidence supporting the association of 19 genes with RASopathy conditions. Using the semiquantitative literature curation method developed by the ClinGen Gene Curation Working Group, evidence for each gene was curated and scored for Noonan syndrome (NS), Costello syndrome, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, NS with multiple lentigines, and Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair. The curated evidence supporting each gene–disease relationship was then discussed and approved by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel. Each association’s strength was classified as definitive, strong, moderate, limited, disputed, or no evidence. Eleven genes were classified as definitively associated with at least one RASopathy condition. Two genes classified as strong for association with at least one RASopathy condition while one gene was moderate and three were limited. The RAS EP also disputed the association of two genes for all RASopathy conditions. Overall, our results provide a greater understanding of the different gene–disease relationships within the RASopathies and can help in guiding and directing clinicians, patients, and researchers who are identifying variants in individuals with a suspected RASopathy.

Objectives Noonan spectrum disorders (NSDs) occur in 1:1000-2500 live births. Currently, there are no guidelines for prenatal molecular genetic testing for NSDs. Recent studies recommend prenatal testing for NSDs when ultrasonography detects two or more associated abnormalities. A stronger association between ultrasound findings and NSDs would enable more informed prenatal genetic testing.Methods A total of 212 newborns (0-12 weeks) with prenatal ultrasound findings and a clinical suspicion of a NSD were referred for molecular genetic testing. Of these, 159/212 newborns tested had a single ultrasound abnormality and 53/212 newborns had two or more. Testing was performed by either a microarray-based resequencing assay or next generation sequencing of RAS/MAPK pathway genes associated with NSDs. Prenatal ultrasound findings in positive and negative cases were compared.Results A disease-causing variant was identified in 21.7% (46/212) of newborns tested. Of these positive cases, 67.4% (31/46) had only one ultrasound abnormality reported. The rate of detecting a disease-causing variant in cases with one ultrasound finding was 19.5% (31/159), which was not significantly different (p-value = 0.36) than that in cases with two or more ultrasound findings (28.3%; 15/53).Conclusions Prenatal molecular testing for NSDs should be considered even in the presence of a single associated abnormal ultrasound finding.

The RASopathies are a complex group of diseases regarding phenotype and genetic etiology. The ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel assessed published and other publicly available evidence supporting the association of 19 genes with RASopathy conditions. Using the semi-quantitative literature curation method developed by the ClinGen Gene Curation Working Group, evidence for each gene was curated and scored for Noonan syndrome, Costello syndrome, cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome, Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines (NSML), and Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair (NS/LAH).The curated evidence supporting each gene-disease relationship was then discussed and approved by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel. Each association’s strength was classified as Definitive, Strong, Moderate, Limited, Disputed, or No Evidence. Eleven genes were classified as definitively associated with at least one RASopathy condition. Two genes classified as strong for association with at least one RASopathy condition while one gene was moderate and three were limited. The RAS EP also refuted the association of two genes for a RASopathy condition. Overall, our results provide a greater understanding of the different gene-disease relationships within the RASopathies and can help guide and direct clinicians, patients and researchers who are identifying variants in individuals with a suspected RASopathyGRANT NUMBERS:Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) under award number U41HG006834. MZ received support from German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF): NSEuroNet (FKZ 01GM1602A), GeNeRARe (FKZ 01GM1519A).