Reactively canceling movements is a vital feature of the motor system to ensure safety. This behavior can be studied in the laboratory using the stop signal task. There remains ambiguity about whether a point-of-no-return exists, after which a response cannot be aborted. A separate question concerns whether motor system inhibition associated with attempted stopping persists when stopping is unsuccessful. We address these two questions using electromyography (EMG) in two stop signal task experiments. Experiment 1 (n = 24) involved simple right and left index finger responses in separate task blocks. Experiment 2 (n = 28) involved a response choice between the right index and pinky fingers. To evaluate the approximate point-of-no-return, we measured EMG in responding fingers during the 100 ms preceding the stop signal and observed significantly greater EMG amplitudes during failed than successful stop trials in both experiments. Thus, EMG differentiated failed from successful stopping prior to the stop signal, regardless of whether there was a response choice. To address whether motor inhibition persists after failed stopping, we assessed EMG peak-to-offset durations and slopes (i.e., the rate of EMG decline) for go, failed stop, and successful stop (partial response EMG) trials. EMG peak-to-offset was shorter and steeper in failed stop trials compared to go and successful stop partial response EMG trials, suggesting motor inhibition persists even when failing to stop. These findings indicate EMG is sensitive to a point at which participants can no longer successfully stop an ongoing movement and suggest the peak-to-offset time of response-related EMG activity during failed stopping reflects stopping-related inhibition.
This study investigated the cardiorespiratory responses to perceptually self- regulated shallow water exercise (SR-SWE) efforts. Females (26 ± 6 years) performed a series of SWE bouts prescribed at rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 (Borg scale) and an incremental, SR-SWE bout to a max of RPE 20. Oxygen uptake (VO2 ), heart rate (HR), and blood lactate (BLa) were monitored. VO 2, HR, and BLa ranged from 0.68 ± 0.13 l·min –1 , 90 ± 16 bpm, 2.0 ± 0.7 mM (RPE 9) to 2.21 ± 0.21 l·min–1 , 162 ± 11 bpm, and 3.9 ± 1.6 mM (RPE 17), respectively. Peak VO2, HR, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and BLa were 2.72 ± 0.33 l·min –1 , 181 ± 7 bpm, 1.05 ± 0.05, and 8.1 ± 1.7 mM, respectively. The group linear regression equation was as follows: VO 2 = –0.97 ± 0.189 (RPE), R2 = .89 (p < .0001). The regression model predicted VO 2 peak of 2.81 ± 0.28 l·min –1 equivalent to the measured value of 2.72 ± 0.33 l·min–1 (p = .33). Findings suggest that self-regulation of intensity based on prescribed RPE is a viable way of regulating intensity while exercising in a shallow water medium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.